![[Harassment Case] "Said Order Has Not Been Complied With": HC Issues Contempt Notice to Indore Police Commissioner](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-14-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued a contempt notice to the Indore Police Commissioner for failing to report on an incident where a teacher allegedly strip-searched minor girls. The court demanded compliance with previous orders and instructed the commissioner to appear in court on November 25 regarding the investigation into the matter.
![[Landmark Judgement] "Centre’s 2023 Model Law on Prisons Doesn’t Have Reference of Caste-Based Discriminations": CJI Bans Inequality in Jails](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fake-WhatsApp-Message-Circulated-In-The-Name-Of-Chief-Justice-Chandrachud-Check-Out-odishabytes.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Chief Justice of India criticized the Centre’s 2023 Model Law on Prisons for omitting caste-based discrimination prohibitions. He ruled that inequality in prisons is unconstitutional, emphasizing equal treatment for all inmates. The judgment highlighted the need for reforms, rejecting caste-based classifications that hinder rehabilitation and violate constitutional rights.
![[Sub-Classification Within SC/ST] "No Error Apparent on the Face of the Record': SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Review Of Its Sub-Quota Judgment](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/News-on-AIR.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India reinforced the use of English as the official language for court proceedings, raising concerns about the growing use of Hindi. This has sparked debates about language inclusivity in the legal system. The bench made it clear that all proceedings must be conducted in English unless specified otherwise by Parliament, with the Chief Justice also advocating for the use of regional languages to enhance justice delivery.
The Karnataka High Court directed the Director General of Police to alert all police stations about a woman who has filed 10 criminal cases against different men over the past decade. It also instructed that no further complaints should be registered on her behalf without a preliminary inquiry, aiming to prevent misuse of the legal system.
![[Acid Attack on Dog] "Life Is As Dear To a Mute Creature, As It Is To Human": Delhi Court While Sentencing Accused](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-33-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A Delhi court sentenced a man to one year in prison for throwing acid on a dog, causing it to lose an eye. The court emphasized the importance of compassion toward animals, citing Mahatma Gandhi and philosopher Emmanuel Kant. The judgment also included a fine and highlighted the need for strict punishment to deter cruelty against animals.
![[Cruelty Allegations] Supreme Court Stays Delhi HC Divorce Order for Chef Kunal Kapur](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-21-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 30th July, The Supreme Court stayed the Delhi High Court’s decision granting chef Kunal Kapur a divorce, following his wife’s appeal. The High Court had cited cruelty, but Kapur’s wife contested the ruling. The case has been referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre for a potential out-of-court resolution. Kapur’s wife argued that the judgment violated Supreme Court guidelines and highlighted attempts at reconciliation.
The Madras High Court today ruled that schools cannot use Transfer Certificates to collect pending fees and should not make entries regarding fee arrears on the TC. Violation of this order will be dealt with under child protection laws. Children should not be involved in fee collection, as it causes trauma and stigma. The court also emphasized the psychological impact on children and urged schools to provide support during financial strains.
Today, On 15th July, The Supreme Court requested a response from Payal Abdullah regarding Omar Abdullah’s divorce plea. Omar’s lawyer argued that the marriage was “dead” as they had been living separately for 15 years and requested the court to dissolve the marriage. The High Court had earlier denied the divorce, citing unsubstantiated cruelty allegations.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that there are no legal restrictions on filing multiple divorce petitions based on cruelty. This ruling allows individuals to seek divorce repeatedly if they continue to face cruelty, providing legal clarity and protection for victims of ongoing abuse. The decision represents a significant advancement in matrimonial law.