The Delhi High Court has given BJP leader Tajinder Bagga four weeks to respond to Subramanian Swamy’s plea to quash defamation summons related to a tweet alleging Bagga’s criminal record. The next hearing is set for August 26, after both parties submit their arguments on the case’s maintainability.
The Supreme Court of India urged Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Congress MP Vivek Tankha to resolve a defamation dispute amicably. Tankha’s claims against Chouhan and BJP leaders for allegedly damaging his reputation over OBC reservation accusations are currently under examination, with pending hearings scheduled for May.
A Pune special MP/MLA court has approved Rahul Gandhi’s request to convert his defamation trial concerning Vinayak Savarkar from a summary to a summons format. This allows Gandhi to present detailed evidence and cross-examine witnesses, deemed necessary by the judge due to the complexity of factual and legal questions involved.
Today, On 19th March, The Supreme Court extended its order exempting former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan from personal appearance in a defamation case. The case pertains to alleged defamatory remarks, and Chouhan had sought relief from mandatory court presence. The Court’s decision spares him from attending proceedings in person. This extension provides temporary legal relief while the case progresses.
Today, On 20th February, A Delhi court rejected the defamation case filed by AAP leader Satyendar Jain against BJP leader Bansuri Swaraj. Jain had accused Swaraj of making defamatory remarks against him. The court ruled that the statements did not warrant legal action. This decision marks a legal victory for Swaraj in the ongoing political tussle.
Satyendar Jain has filed a defamation suit against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj over allegations she made during a television interview, labeling him as “corrupt” and a “fraud.” Jain claims these false statements have severely harmed his reputation. The case, viewed as politically motivated, is ongoing with hearings scheduled until January 2025.
The Rouse Avenue Court has given BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj one week to file her response in a defamation case. The case involves allegations made against her, and the court has allowed time for her to present her side. This development is part of ongoing legal proceedings. The court’s decision ensures both sides have an opportunity to be heard fairly.
![[Defamation Case] 'In Politics, Be Ready for Unwarranted Compliments': SC Quashes Proceedings Against Union Minister L. Murugan](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-2-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 5th December, the Supreme Court quashed criminal defamation proceedings against Union Minister L. Murugan, overruling a Madras High Court decision. The case originated from comments made in December 2020 regarding the Murasoli Trust. The court emphasized the need for resilience in political discourse and acknowledged Murugan’s lack of intent to defame.
Defamation in Indian law, defined under Section 499 of the IPC, involves harming an individual’s reputation through false statements. It includes criminal and civil aspects, with penalties for offenders. Recent judicial interpretations, including the controversial Subramanian Swamy case, highlight tensions between protecting reputation and maintaining free speech rights, necessitating careful legal consideration.
Today(23rd Sept), The Delhi High Court dismissed a plea from former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, current Delhi CM Atishi, and other AAP leaders to withdraw a defamation case stemming from 2018 allegations that the BJP conspired to remove nearly 3 million voters. BJP leader Rajiv Babbar filed the case, asserting that AAP’s claims were false and damaging.
