Today (14th May): The Supreme Court rejected BJP leader H Raja’s plea to dismiss criminal cases against him for controversial comments on Periyar and women. The court stressed the decline in political discourse and the need for caution in public statements by politicians. The charges stem from Raja’s derogatory remarks, and the legal proceedings will continue as the court upheld the accountability of political speech.
Today(on 10th May), The Supreme Court addressed Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea to consolidate cases over his Sanatana Dharma comments. Notices were issued to states and complainants after a petition amendment. The Court’s consistent stance on Stalin’s remarks highlights the legal scrutiny and widespread repercussions, emphasizing responsible speech and the need for social harmony.
Today, On 3rd May, The Supreme Court of India scheduled a final hearing on May 14 for multiple petitions challenging FIRs against the Vice-Chancellor of SHUATS in Uttar Pradesh and others, related to allegations of unlawful religious conversions. The court also directed the submission of written arguments, highlighting the complexity of the case and its constitutional significance.
The Bombay High Court has ruled that filing false cases against a husband by the wife constitutes cruelty, emphasizing the need to prevent legal misuse in marital disputes. The court upheld the lower court’s decision to grant the divorce, citing the wife’s multiple baseless legal claims. This ruling reaffirms the serious consequences of misuse of legal provisions in familial disputes.
The Allahabad High Court initiated a suo motu PIL to investigate encroachment allegations on Indian Army land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The Court emphasized the importance of protecting defense land and scheduled the next hearing after three weeks to allow all parties to present their arguments. The Ministry of Defence is expected to respond to the allegations.
More than 2,000 cases involving Members of Parliament and Members of Legislative Assembly were resolved in 2023, but 4,697 cases remained pending as of January 1, 2024. The need for swift adjudication in light of the upcoming elections, where 18% of candidates face criminal charges, was emphasized. Special courts and High Court oversight are crucial.
The Jharkhand High Court directed the CBI to provide a detailed report on ongoing criminal cases involving MPs and MLAs, emphasizing transparency and accountability. The court inquired about delays in submitting cases and presenting witnesses. Six MP/MLA courts actively addressing criminal cases against public officials as per directions from the Supreme Court.
The Delhi High Court directed judges to give priority to criminal cases involving MPs and MLAs, aiming for swift and efficient resolution. The court also instructed the registry to re-allocate pending cases and disseminate the judgment to other judges. Special MP/MLA courts were advised to prioritize cases punishable by death or life imprisonment.=”__JETPACK_AI_ERROR__”
On Monday(1st March), The Madras High Court refused police protection to BJP member ‘Milakaipodi’ Venkatesan, facing 49 red sanders smuggling cases. Justice Anand Venkatesh highlighted concerns over granting protection to individuals with criminal backgrounds, citing the importance of upholding the justice system’s credibility. The court criticized the Tamil Nadu police for their inconsistent stance on the matter.
The Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of Shiba Shankar Das, overturning a bail condition restricting his political activities. Das, a former mayor and BJP leader, challenged the constraint imposed by the Orissa High Court, emphasizing fundamental rights. NEW DELHI: Recently, The Supreme Court has made a significant ruling affecting the rights of individuals under […]