Delhi HC Seeks Centre’s Reply on AAP’s Plea Challenging Rent Demand for Party Office at Vithalbhai Patel House

Today, On 7th July, The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre to respond to AAP’s plea against the rent demand for its party office at Vithalbhai Patel House. The next hearing in the matter is scheduled for July 22.

Delhi HC to Centre: “Respond to AAP’s Plea Against ‘Ex Parte’ Cancellation of State Party Office Allotment”

The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre to respond to AAP’s petition challenging the “ex parte” cancellation of its state party office allotment, stressing the need to follow fair procedures and natural justice in such matters.

Privacy Violation or Legal Evidence? | Supreme Court Questions Use of Wife’s Secretly Recorded Conversations in Divorce Case

A man reportedly used a mobile app to secretly record his wife’s private conversations for years. He submitted these recordings as evidence in a divorce case, which drew criticism. The Supreme Court raised questions about the legality and fairness of using such recordings. The case highlights concerns about privacy and misuse of technology in legal matters.

“Did You Discuss Constitutional Ethos?, We Would Like to See”: SC to Review Video of DHCBA Meet on Women Quota Rejection

Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court decided to review a video of the Delhi High Court Bar Association meeting where a women’s quota proposal was rejected. The Court questioned the lack of constitutional discussions during the rejection process. The matter is adjourned until November 18, focusing on the decision-making process regarding women’s representation.

Supreme Court Set Aside an order against Bloomberg’s Report on Zee Entertainment

The Supreme Court set aside the order against Bloomberg’s report on Zee Entertainment, which alleged a $241 million accounting irregularity. It emphasized the need for a more thorough assessment of facts in such cases, nullifying the injunction. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the prior decisions and stressed the necessity for a proper evaluation before granting an injunction.