• Fri. Apr 3rd, 2026
    • '

    Tag: court ruling

    Blacklisting Order Must Meet Standards Of Fairness, Proportionality, And Properly Reasoned Decision-Making: Chhattisgarh High Court
    Blacklisting Order Must Meet Standards Of Fairness, Proportionality, And Properly Reasoned Decision-Making: Chhattisgarh High Court
    High CourtHeadlines

    Blacklisting Order Must Meet Standards Of Fairness, Proportionality, And Properly Reasoned Decision-Making: Chhattisgarh High Court

    The Chhattisgarh High Court delivered a significant judgment on writ petitions, partially granting them and quashing orders that had blacklisted multiple construction companies for three years. The High Court ruled that , Blacklisting Order Must Meet The Standards Of Fairness, Proportionality, And A Properly Reasoned Order

    author
    Janakpuri Biker Death Case| Economic Background Cannot Eclipse Caution: Court Denies Bail To Labourer
    Janakpuri Biker Death Case| Economic Background Cannot Eclipse Caution: Court Denies Bail To Labourer
    Other CourtsLatest news

    Janakpuri Biker Death Case| Economic Background Cannot Eclipse Caution: Court Denies Bail To Labourer

    A Delhi court rejected the bail plea of a labourer accused after a 25-year-old biker died by falling into an open pit in Janakpuri. Economic Background Cannot Eclipse Caution says Court while dnying Bail To Labourer In Fatal Case.

    author
    FIR Valid Even If Lawyer Helps Draft It, Credibility Cannot Be Doubted: Allahabad High Court
    FIR Valid Even If Lawyer Helps Draft It, Credibility Cannot Be Doubted: Allahabad High Court
    High CourtLatest news

    FIR Valid Even If Lawyer Helps Draft It, Credibility Cannot Be Doubted: Allahabad High Court

    The Allahabad High Court ruled that an FIR does not lose credibility merely because it was drafted with a lawyer’s assistance. While permitting legal help, the Court stressed careful scrutiny to rule out malice. The Bench decided this in Jagdamba Harijan’s acid attack conviction appeal.

    author
    Assurance Doesn’t Constitute Abetment: Punjab and Haryana HC Rejects Plea Against Accused’s Family in False Promise of Marriage Case
    Assurance Doesn’t Constitute Abetment: Punjab and Haryana HC Rejects Plea Against Accused’s Family in False Promise of Marriage Case
    High CourtHeadlines

    Assurance Doesn’t Constitute Abetment: Punjab and Haryana HC Rejects Plea Against Accused’s Family in False Promise of Marriage Case

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court rejected a woman’s plea to prosecute the parents and grandmother of the man she accused of rape on a false promise of marriage, holding that her claims of their alleged assurance did not constitute abetment.

    author
    Selective and Plainly Arbitrary: Court Slams CBI’s Use of ‘South Group’ Label for Excise Policy Accused
    Selective and Plainly Arbitrary: Court Slams CBI’s Use of ‘South Group’ Label for Excise Policy Accused
    Other CourtsHeadlines

    Selective and Plainly Arbitrary: Court Slams CBI’s Use of ‘South Group’ Label for Excise Policy Accused

    Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court criticised the Central Bureau of Investigation for tagging some accused in the Delhi excise policy case as the ‘South Group’ while avoiding any corresponding ‘North Group’ label for others. Calling it plainly arbitrary and unwarranted.

    author
    Pre-Meditated and Choreographed: Delhi Court Slams CBI, Orders Action Against Officer In Excise Policy Case
    Pre-Meditated and Choreographed: Delhi Court Slams CBI, Orders Action Against Officer In Excise Policy Case
    Other CourtsHeadlines

    Pre-Meditated and Choreographed: Delhi Court Slams CBI, Orders Action Against Officer In Excise Policy Case

    Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court ordered action against a Central Bureau of Investigation officer in the excise policy case, saying departmental proceedings are needed to ensure accountability. The judge termed the investigation “pre-meditated and choreographed,” asserting the allegations were tailored to support a narrative.

    author
    Even Instagram Stories Are Better Than This FIR: Supreme Court Quashes Case Against Former Zee Official Ashish Dave
    Even Instagram Stories Are Better Than This FIR: Supreme Court Quashes Case Against Former Zee Official Ashish Dave
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Even Instagram Stories Are Better Than This FIR: Supreme Court Quashes Case Against Former Zee Official Ashish Dave

    Today, On 27th February, Supreme Court of India dismissed an FIR against Ashish Dave, former head of Zee Rajasthan and Zee 24 Ghanta, in an alleged extortion case. The court said, “Even Instagram stories are better than this FIR… Is this James Bond movie?”

    author
    “No Prima Facie Case?” CBI Moves Delhi High Court Against Discharge of Arvind Kejriwal, Sisodia in Excise Policy Case
    “No Prima Facie Case?” CBI Moves Delhi High Court Against Discharge of Arvind Kejriwal, Sisodia in Excise Policy Case
    HeadlinesOther Courts

    Excise Policy Case| No Overarching Conspiracy: Court Closes CBI Case Against Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia

    Today, On 27th February, A Delhi court dismissed all charges against 23 individuals in the excise policy case, including Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and K Kavitha. The Court ruled, “There was no overarching conspiracy or criminal intent in the excise policy.”

    author
    Mere Breaking-Up Doesn’t Mean Instigation: Delhi High Court on Abetment of Suicide in Relationships
    Mere Breaking-Up Doesn’t Mean Instigation: Delhi High Court on Abetment of Suicide in Relationships
    High CourtLatest news

    Mere Breaking-Up Doesn’t Mean Instigation: Delhi High Court on Abetment of Suicide in Relationships

    The Delhi High Court has ruled that ending a romantic relationship cannot be treated as instigation to commit suicide. The Court clarified that a breakup alone does not fulfil the legal requirements to constitute the offense of abetment of suicide.

    author
    Income Tax Returns Alone Enough for Accident Claims, Insurers Cannot Demand Extra Proof: “J&K High Court
    Income Tax Returns Alone Enough for Accident Claims, Insurers Cannot Demand Extra Proof: “J&K High Court
    High CourtLatest news

    Income Tax Returns Alone Enough for Accident Claims, Insurers Cannot Demand Extra Proof: J&K High Court

    The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that once an Income Tax Return is produced to prove income, courts need not examine its source absent rebuttal evidence, as statutory ITR filings carry evidentiary value unless shown to be false or unreliable.

    author