Marriage Failure Alone Can’t Invoke 498A, Vague Allegations Can’t Drag Relatives Into Matrimonial Disputes: Madras HC

The Madras High Court held that Section 498A proceedings cannot be initiated merely because a marriage has broken down or because the accused are related to the spouses involved in the dispute. Quashing proceedings against the husband’s relatives, the Court said vague and omnibus allegations cannot be used to drag family members into matrimonial disputes.

Telangana High Court Annuls Marriage After Husband Allegedly Gave Wrong Date Of Birth On Matrimonial Website

The Telangana High Court annulled a marriage after finding that the husband had misrepresented his date of birth on an online matrimonial platform. The Court held that the incorrect age details misled the wife regarding horoscope compatibility, leading her to consent to marriage under a mistaken belief.

Father Is Obliged To Provide Education To Daughter Also, Woman Empowerment Does Not Remain On Paper: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that a father’s obligation toward his daughters includes funding higher education and not merely providing basic maintenance. Stressing that women empowerment must be implemented in practice, the Court directed payment of Rs 46.26 lakh towards the daughters’ medical and engineering education expenses.

Mere existence of Dargah does not make land a Waqf property, Waqf Board Has No Automatic Claim: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court held that the mere presence of a Dargah on land does not automatically place the property under the Waqf Board’s control. The Court ruled that the Board must first establish, in accordance with law, that the property is a valid Waqf before claiming jurisdiction.

Marriage Being Dead For All Practical Purposes Has To Be Nullified: Supreme Court Grants Divorce Under Article 142

The Supreme Court dissolved a marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution, holding that the relationship had irretrievably broken down and was “dead for all practical purposes.” The Court set aside decisions of the Family Court and Andhra Pradesh High Court while directing a comprehensive financial settlement.

Misused And Abused His Authority: Allahabad HC Criticises Former CoP Ajay Kumar Mishra, Quashes Case Against Ghaziabad Family

The Allahabad High Court quashed Gangsters Act proceedings against a Ghaziabad family, holding that the dispute arose from property and financial transactions rather than organised criminal activity. The Court also observed that former Ghaziabad Police Commissioner Ajay Kumar Mishra appeared to have misused his authority in initiating the proceedings.

Very Serious Allegations: Supreme Court Rejects Jyoti Malhotra’s Bail Plea In National Security Case

The Supreme Court dismissed the bail plea of Haryana-based travel blogger Jyoti Malhotra, observing that allegations of sharing sensitive information with Pakistani intelligence operatives were “very serious.” The Court held that national security considerations must prevail while examining bail requests in such cases.

Delhi High Court Refuses Fresh Bar Council Of Delhi Elections, Ends High-Profile Challenge Over Poll Irregularities Claims

The Delhi High Court declined to order a fresh election for the Bar Council of Delhi, rejecting pleas seeking repolling over alleged electoral irregularities. The decision brings temporary closure to a significant legal dispute concerning the conduct, fairness, and administration of the BCD elections.

Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Teacher’s Suspension over Social Media Remarks Against State Minister

The Rajasthan High Court set aside the suspension of a government school teacher accused of posting objectionable social media comments about a State minister, holding that suspension must have statutory backing and cannot be exercised as an unfettered executive power affecting civil rights.

A Major Woman Has Right To Live As Per Her Wishes, Cannot Be Illegally Detained By Police: Madhya Pradesh High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that a major woman has the right to live according to her own wishes and cannot be unlawfully detained by police. However, the Court clarified that she cannot reside as the wife of a man who is below the legally prescribed marriageable age.