Don’t Want to Publicise the Investigation: Bombay HC Orders Maharashtra Govt to Keep Justice Gautam Patel Threat Probe Reports Confidential

The Bombay High Court directed the Centre and Maharashtra government to keep investigation reports on threats and an alleged attack against retired Justice Gautam Patel confidential. The Court ordered sealed preservation of reports, noting the matter relates to threats allegedly linked to a judicial verdict.

Relief to Senior Citizens: Tripura High Court Says They Can’t Be Penalised for Not Tracking Cases Online

The Tripura High Court held that senior citizens lacking technological proficiency cannot be penalised for failing to track court cases online. Setting aside a dismissal in a property dispute, the Court emphasised that digital access and technological awareness vary significantly among elderly litigants.

Raja Raghuvanshi Honeymoon Murder: Supreme Court to Hear State’s Challenge Against Sonam Raghuvanshi’s Bail

The Supreme Court agreed to hear Meghalaya’s plea challenging bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, accused of murdering her husband Raja Raghuvanshi during their honeymoon. The State argued she was likely to abscond, urging the Court to reconsider the bail order.

Government Never Called E20 Blending an Experiment: Attorney General Denies Media Claims on Supreme Court Submissions

The Attorney General’s Office clarified that media reports claiming the Union described the E20 ethanol blending programme as an “experiment” before the Supreme Court were incorrect. It stated no such submission was made, rejecting the reports as a misrepresentation of arguments presented in court.

Supreme Court Rules Lawyers Cannot Surrender or Compromise Clients’ Property Rights Without Explicit Consent

The Supreme Court held that advocates cannot surrender or compromise a client’s substantive property rights without explicit authorisation. The Court ruled that a compromise decree based solely on a lawyer’s consent, without the client’s signature or approval, is legally unsustainable under the Civil Procedure Code.

Rs 370 Biryani Controversy Reaches Supreme Court: PIL Demands Framework for Stand-Up Comedy, Podcasts and Online Content Platforms

A PIL before the Supreme Court seeks a regulatory framework for stand-up comedy, podcasts, live streams, and digital content. The plea over the “Rs 370 Biryani” controversy argues that creators should not face criminal action and highlights algorithm-driven content spread.

Delhi HC Allows 17-Year-Old Minor Son to Donate Liver Portion to Ailing Father in Exceptional Medical Case

The Delhi High Court allowed a 17-year-old minor to donate part of his liver to his critically ill father, considering exceptional circumstances. The Court approved the transplant after finding that the son was the only medically suitable donor available among relatives.

Cow Slaughter Ban Row: Tamil Nadu Moves Supreme Court Against Madras HC Order 

The Tamil Nadu government has approached the Supreme Court challenging the Madras High Court’s order imposing a statewide ban on cow and calf slaughter. The State questioned directions issued to authorities while hearing a PIL seeking regulation of slaughter at authorised places under law.

You Mean Judges Are Hot-Headed?, Get Influenced by Movie?: Karnataka HC Questions Actor Darshan’s Plea Against Release of Movie ‘BOSS’

The Karnataka High Court questioned Darshan Srinivas’s claim that the Kannada film BOSS could affect the fairness of his Renukaswamy murder trial. Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur observed that the concern should be possible impact on witnesses and proceedings, not whether judges could be influenced.