Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna announced a new case allocation roster effective November 11, organizing 16 benches. The CJI and senior judges will handle letter petitions and public interest litigations, focusing on social justice, election disputes, and habeas corpus cases. Justice Surya Kant’s bench will also address election-related matters.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Wrongful Demolitions Warrant Compensation; Officials Should Not Be Shielded from Accountability": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Watch-What-is-Bulldozer-Justice-And-Why-Does-the-SC-Want-Guidelines-Against-It_-on-News9-Plus.png?resize=447%2C348&ssl=1)
Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court condemned “bulldozer justice,” stating that legal actions should not imply guilt before a fair trial. It ruled demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful, emphasizing due process, accountability, and the protection of family homes from arbitrary state action, regardless of accusations or convictions.
![[R.G. Kar Rape & Murder] 'Leaves Home in CBI Vehicle': Victim's Parents Testify as Trial Begins in Sealdah Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/img-4.png?resize=447%2C270&ssl=1)
Today, On 11th November, The trial for the rape and murder of a young girl commenced at Sealdah Court on November 11. The victim’s parents are the first witnesses, with a total of 128 expected to testify. The case, involving a civic volunteer as the sole accused, has drawn significant controversy, with claims of innocence from the defendant.
At a farewell event for Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Attorney General R. Venkatramani praised his scholarly qualities, commitment to justice, and impactful tenure. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal highlighted Chandrachud’s openness to critical issues, emphasizing that his legacy would endure due to his thoughtful and inclusive approaches to leadership.
![[Hacking Incident] Calcutta HC YouTube Channel Live-Streaming Session Interrupted by Obscene Content](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Image.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Yesterday, On 28th October, a Calcutta High Court live stream was interrupted by an obscene video, raising concerns over the safety of virtual courtrooms. The authorities are investigating the incident, which follows a previous cybersecurity breach at the Supreme Court. Enhanced security measures are considered essential for safeguarding judicial platforms against cyber threats.
Today, On 23rd October, the Delhi High Court scheduled a January 22 hearing for Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against Enforcement Directorate summons related to the excise policy case. Kejriwal seeks legal relief amid investigations into alleged irregularities and money laundering, arguing the process is politically motivated and unconstitutional.
Today(on 4th September),The Supreme Court of India has stayed a Gujarat High Court order requiring Times of India, Indian Express, and Divya Bhaskar to issue a fresh apology for inaccurate reporting on court proceedings. The decision follows an appeal by the Times of India regarding alleged misrepresentation of judicial observations.
The Madras High Court Advocates’ Association (MHCAA) unanimously decided to boycott court proceedings on July 8 to protest three new criminal laws. The resolution emphasized the need for members’ support and cooperation for the protest’s success, citing concerns about the impact on justice and fairness in the legal system.
Some High Court judges start late and end early despite scheduled timings, as lamented by Justice BR Gavai. He also highlighted the importance of judicial punctuality, respect towards lawyers, and cautioned against judges lobbying for elevation. Concerns were raised about misrepresentation of judicial statements and summoning government officials unnecessarily.