‘So Many Panel Counsel, Yet No Appearance’: Supreme Court Criticizes Union of India

Today, On 12th December, the Supreme Court criticized the Union of India for inadequate legal representation in important cases, notably regarding a student with disabilities seeking MBBS admission. The Court emphasized accountability, emphasizing the need for timely representation to ensure justice and maintain public confidence, ultimately granting the student’s admission.

“Please Circulate a Letter; No Oral Mentioning”: CJI Khanna on Plea Against Delhi HC Senior Designation of 70 Lawyers

A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court’s designation of 70 lawyers as Senior Advocates. Following the designation process, a committee member resigned, alleging the final list was altered without his approval. The Supreme Court’s response will address concerns about the transparency of the designation process.

‘Remo D’Souza’s Plea to Quash Cheating Case’: SC Seeks UP Govt’s Response

Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court requested a response from the Uttar Pradesh government regarding a petition by choreographer Remo D’Souza, who seeks to quash a 2016 cheating case against him. The case, linked to a failed investment promise, highlights critical legal issues that may impact future entertainment industry regulations.

CJI Khanna Announces New Roster for Case Allocation With Effect From November 11, Top 3 Benches Assigned For PILs Hearing

Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna announced a new case allocation roster effective November 11, organizing 16 benches. The CJI and senior judges will handle letter petitions and public interest litigations, focusing on social justice, election disputes, and habeas corpus cases. Justice Surya Kant’s bench will also address election-related matters.

[Bulldozer Justice] “Wrongful Demolitions Warrant Compensation; Officials Should Not Be Shielded from Accountability”: Supreme Court

Today, On 13th November, the Supreme Court condemned “bulldozer justice,” stating that legal actions should not imply guilt before a fair trial. It ruled demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful, emphasizing due process, accountability, and the protection of family homes from arbitrary state action, regardless of accusations or convictions.

[R.G. Kar Rape & Murder] ‘Leaves Home in CBI Vehicle’: Victim’s Parents Testify as Trial Begins in Sealdah Court

Today, On 11th November, The trial for the rape and murder of a young girl commenced at Sealdah Court on November 11. The victim’s parents are the first witnesses, with a total of 128 expected to testify. The case, involving a civic volunteer as the sole accused, has drawn significant controversy, with claims of innocence from the defendant.

“When a Towering Tree of Justice Steps Back, the Winds Move Differently”: Justice Khanna on CJI Chandrachud’s Farewell

At a farewell event for Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Attorney General R. Venkatramani praised his scholarly qualities, commitment to justice, and impactful tenure. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal highlighted Chandrachud’s openness to critical issues, emphasizing that his legacy would endure due to his thoughtful and inclusive approaches to leadership.

[Hacking Incident] Calcutta HC YouTube Channel Live-Streaming Session Interrupted by Obscene Content

Yesterday, On 28th October, a Calcutta High Court live stream was interrupted by an obscene video, raising concerns over the safety of virtual courtrooms. The authorities are investigating the incident, which follows a previous cybersecurity breach at the Supreme Court. Enhanced security measures are considered essential for safeguarding judicial platforms against cyber threats.

[Excise Policy Case] Delhi HC Schedules January 22 Hearing for Kejriwal’s Plea Against ED Summons

Today, On 23rd October, the Delhi High Court scheduled a January 22 hearing for Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against Enforcement Directorate summons related to the excise policy case. Kejriwal seeks legal relief amid investigations into alleged irregularities and money laundering, arguing the process is politically motivated and unconstitutional.

“Govt Counsel Attend Matters Only If They Are Politically Sensitive?”: Cal HC Slams WB Govt Over ‘Absence of Lawyers’ in Non-Politically Sensitive Cases

Today(5th September),The Calcutta High Court, led by Chief Justice T S Sivagnanam, has criticized the West Bengal government for not sending lawyers to non-political cases despite prior instructions. This rebuke occurred during a hearing of a PIL on tiger attack victims in the Sunderbans.