![[Illegal Tree Felling] "454 Trees Illegally Felled in Violation of Court Orders": SC Issued Contempt Notice to UP Officials](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Image-7.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 29th November, the Supreme Court issued contempt notices to Uttar Pradesh officials for illegally felling 454 trees on Vrindavan Road. The Court mandated that permitted tree-felling must occur only between 6 PM and 8 AM. A halt to further tree felling was ordered, highlighting the need for adherence to judicial directives.
A Bengaluru consumer court ordered Dilmil Matrimony to pay Rs. 60,000 to Vijaya Kumar for failing to provide a suitable match for his son despite receiving Rs. 30,000. The court found the site did not fulfill its obligations or demonstrate effort in service, constituting unfair trade practices and a breach of consumer trust.
Today, On 25th October, A Telangana court ordered Minister Konda Surekha to delete her controversial post linking KT Rama Rao to the divorce of actors Naga Chaitanya and Samantha Ruth Prabhu. Rao filed a defamation lawsuit after Surekha claimed he was involved in the split. The ruling emphasizes accountability in public statements regarding private lives.
Yesterday, On 25th October, the Supreme Court criticized the Patna High Court for issuing post-dated bail orders that would take effect only after five months. The Supreme Court emphasized the need for timely justice and remanded the cases for reconsideration. This ruling reflects a broader push for transparency in legal proceedings.
The Telangana High Court directed the State Legislative Assembly to address disqualification petitions against defected MLAs within four weeks. The Court stated that if no action is taken, the matter will be reopened and appropriate orders passed. The bench questioned the tolerance of the Speaker’s inaction and emphasized the need for timely resolution.
On Thursday(5th September),The Supreme Court directed Sahara Group to deposit Rs 1,000 crore into an escrow account within 15 days and permitted a joint venture to develop its Versova land, aiming to realize Rs 10,000 crore. This amount is required to be deposited into the SEBI-Sahara refund account to return investors’ money as per a 2012 court order.
The Supreme Court today stayed its decision to record only the appearances of lawyers physically or online during hearings in court orders. Senior Counsel Kapil Sibal raised the issue, leading to a delay in the implementation of the order issued on August 29. The next hearing is scheduled for September 11. The court emphasized that only actively participating lawyers should have their presence recorded.
The Delhi High Court has directed lawyers to avoid unnecessary adjournments and to file timely status reports in bail, parole, and similar cases. The circular emphasizes the importance of expeditious case disposal and efficient judicial functioning. It mandates the submission of status reports and requests prompt compliance with court orders for smooth judicial proceedings.
Today(on 14th June),The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court’s decision to permit the demolition of a Shiva Temple on the Yamuna floodplains. Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and Augustine George Masih found no fault with the High Court’s order and questioned the petitioner-samiti’s standing to challenge the demolition.
On Thursday(6th June),The Calcutta High Court firmly cautioned the Trinamool Congress (TMC) government about ongoing post-election violence in West Bengal, directing the Bengal Police to promptly intervene. Justices Kaushik Chanda and Apurba Sinha, on the bench, expressed grave apprehensions regarding the state’s law and order situation.