The Punjab and Haryana High Court condemned the use of the term “bouncer” by private security agencies, stating it incites fear and is inappropriate in a civilised society. The Court emphasized that security personnel should foster safety, not intimidation, underscoring the need for better training and regulation of such agencies to uphold public safety.
The Delhi High Court emphasized the sanctity of the Indian Parliament, stating that its breach should not be trivialized or compared to the sacrifices of martyrs like Bhagat Singh. The court questioned the application of the stringent UAPA law, urging the Delhi Police to justify its use in this case.