Today, On 8th January, The Delhi High Court rejected a plea seeking a rehabilitation package under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The petition argued for financial support for communities impacted by the law, but the court ruled against granting such a package. The decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal discourse surrounding the CAA.
The Calcutta High Court expressed disapproval of trial courts offering unwanted advice in divorce proceedings. It emphasized that only the couple involved can decide on reconciliation. This follows a case where a trial court suggested a couple reunite for their child’s sake, which the High Court deemed inappropriate and beyond the court’s jurisdiction.
Justice Hima Kohli and Gary Born addressed the need for a separate statute for international arbitration in India at the London International Disputes Week. They highlighted the existing framework’s effectiveness and emphasized the importance of minimizing court involvement in arbitration to ensure efficient dispute resolution. They also discussed the significance of contextual relevance in legal precedents.
Today (28th March): The Madras High Court expressed grave concern over advocates aiding clients in forcefully acquiring properties, deeming it damaging to the legal profession’s reputation. Justice Venkatesh summoned the involved advocates, police inspector, and property purchaser to address a complaint, emphasizing the need for stricter measures to combat such conduct and asserting the court’s authority.
The Jharkhand High Court intervened in the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi, staying the arrest warrant issued after his remarks about Union Home Minister Amit Shah. The warrant, issued for Gandhi’s failure to appear in court, was suspended for a month by the High Court, instructing him to engage in court proceedings. The case continues.