The Delhi High Court today(21st Jan) dismissed an appeal that challenged the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in elections across various constituencies. The petitioner, Ramesh Chander, argued that under Section 61-A of the Representation of the People Act (RP Act), the Election Commission of India (ECI) should provide individual justifications for using EVMs in each constituency. However, the court did not accept this argument and dismissed the appeal.
![[BREAKING] Krishna Janmabhoomi Case |Supreme Court Says Plea on 15 Lawsuits Consolidation Can Be Raised Later](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Mathura-Temple.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India reviewed a plea regarding the consolidation of 15 lawsuits related to the Mathura Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid dispute, initially ordered by the Allahabad High Court. The Supreme Court supported this consolidation as it serves the interests of justice and stated the plea could be raised later.
Today, On 8th January, The Delhi High Court rejected a plea seeking a rehabilitation package under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The petition argued for financial support for communities impacted by the law, but the court ruled against granting such a package. The decision marks a significant development in the ongoing legal discourse surrounding the CAA.
The Calcutta High Court expressed disapproval of trial courts offering unwanted advice in divorce proceedings. It emphasized that only the couple involved can decide on reconciliation. This follows a case where a trial court suggested a couple reunite for their child’s sake, which the High Court deemed inappropriate and beyond the court’s jurisdiction.
Justice Hima Kohli and Gary Born addressed the need for a separate statute for international arbitration in India at the London International Disputes Week. They highlighted the existing framework’s effectiveness and emphasized the importance of minimizing court involvement in arbitration to ensure efficient dispute resolution. They also discussed the significance of contextual relevance in legal precedents.
Today (28th March): The Madras High Court expressed grave concern over advocates aiding clients in forcefully acquiring properties, deeming it damaging to the legal profession’s reputation. Justice Venkatesh summoned the involved advocates, police inspector, and property purchaser to address a complaint, emphasizing the need for stricter measures to combat such conduct and asserting the court’s authority.
The Jharkhand High Court intervened in the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi, staying the arrest warrant issued after his remarks about Union Home Minister Amit Shah. The warrant, issued for Gandhi’s failure to appear in court, was suspended for a month by the High Court, instructing him to engage in court proceedings. The case continues.