Yesterday, on November 4th, the Delhi High Court reprimanded Advocate Ravi Kumar for disruptive behavior during a hearing, leading to potential contempt proceedings. Justice Kathpalia noted Kumar’s persistent interruptions during dictation, forcing him to conclude in chambers. The case involves a challenge against United Insurance Company regarding alleged malpractices. The Court’s actions highlight the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in judicial proceedings.
![[Bulldozer Action] "Don't Want To Open Pandora Box": SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Alleging Contempt Of Demolition Order By 3 States](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/bulldozer-2.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Today (Oct 24) refused to entertain a plea alleging contempt of its order on demolition of properties by the authorities in Uttarakhand, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. A bench headed by Justice B R Gavai and comprising Justices P K Mishra and K V Viswanathan said it was not inclined to entertain the plea filed by the petitioner who was not directly or indirectly related to the alleged act. The court said it will hear those affected by the demolition of properties.
![[Demolitions in Somnath] "If Authorities in Contempt, Will Ask Them to Restore Structures": SC Declines To Halt Demolitions, Seeks Gujarat's Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-15.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court Today (Oct 4) said if it finds that authorities in Gujarat acted in contempt of its order on demolition of properties, it will ask them to restore the structures. A bench of Justices B R Gavai and K V Viswanathan was hearing a plea seeking initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged violation of the apex court’s September 17 order which had said that there shall be no demolition of properties, including those accused of crimes, across the country without its permission.
The Delhi High Court convicted Advocate Sanjay Rathod for appearing intoxicated before a magistrate and issuing threats against her. The court found his behavior to be contemptuous and unacceptable, but as he had already served five months in jail for related charges, no further sentence was imposed. The incident occurred in 2015 at the Karkardooma Court.
The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has filed a contempt petition Today against the State Bank of India (SBI) for seeking an extension to disclose electoral bond details. This defiance of Supreme Court’s order and the ensuing legal battle reflects the struggle for transparency in political funding, with far-reaching implications for India’s political and financial systems.
The Bombay High Court has issued contempt notices to Kishore Mehta, founder trustee of Lilavati Hospital, and his son Rajesh Mehta for failing to deposit the required 25% of a substantial debt to HDFC Bank. The legal battle dates back to 2002, and the court has given the Mehtas four weeks to respond, underscoring the complex relationship between corporate entities, legal obligations, and the healthcare sector’s governance.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed an inquiry into the alleged contempt of court by advocate Madan Singh, rejecting his apology and emphasizing the need to safeguard the court’s dignity. The lawyer allegedly made derogatory comments about a judge’s family, prompting the court to proceed with formal charges and a thorough investigation.
The Supreme Court of India has issued a non-bailable warrant against a litigant for his disrespectful response to a contempt notice, emphasizing the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining decorum. The litigant’s dismissal of the notice led to the stern action, highlighting the seriousness with which the court views contempt and disrespect within the legal process.