Justices BR Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, and KV Viswanathan today summoned Maharashtra’s Rajesh Kumar over contemptuous comments in an affidavit regarding construction on forest land. The Court warned of contempt proceedings and criticized the government’s lack of seriousness. The case relates to compliance with compensatory afforestation levy and recent budgetary sops. Court may halt the Ladki Bahin Yojana.
A petition has been filed in the Bombay High Court today against leaders of the INDIA bloc, including Rahul Gandhi and Uddhav Thackeray, for allegedly spreading false claims about hacking electronic voting machines (EVMs). The petition seeks contempt proceedings for violating the court’s order on avoiding media trials. The court directed the petitioner to seek listing of their plea before an appropriate bench.
Former locomotive pilot, PU Venkatesan, was convicted of criminal contempt for making scandalous allegations against judges. The Madras High Court sentenced him to six months in prison for displaying no remorse and verbally abusing the judges. His behavior was found to be contemptuous towards the entire justice system. This followed a Facebook post and subsequent letters making reckless allegations.
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court issued a notice to lawyer Sanjeev Kumar for posting contemptuous comments during a video conference hearing. Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta ordered Kumar to explain why contempt of court proceedings should not be initiated against him. The court emphasized the need to maintain decorum and respect for the judicial process.
Prominent public figure Prashant Bhushan accused a judge of politically motivated “dog-whistling” in a controversial tweet. His critics attribute this to his history of judicial criticism and losing public interest litigations. The debate raises questions about judicial integrity and the need for respectful critique. Bhushan’s conduct may lead to potential contempt proceedings, provoking concerns about free speech.
The Supreme Court will consider a plea by leaders of the Madhya Pradesh Bar Council challenging contempt proceedings for organizing a lawyer’s strike in protest of a controversial High Court circular. The plea alleges that the contempt actions were unjustly initiated. The urgency of the matter was acknowledged by the bench, and the case will be considered.
![[EVM Hacking Row] Petition Filed in Bombay HC Against Rahul Gandhi, Uddhav Thackeray](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-24-3.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[ Controversial Tweet] Bhushan Accuses Judge of Political Dog-Whistling, Must Read SC EVM'S Order](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-9-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
![[Lawyer's Strike] SC to Review MP Bar Council Leaders' Contempt Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-2-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)