Nishikant Dubey’s Remarks on Judiciary: Supreme Court to Hear Plea Against BJP MP, Today

Today, On 5th May, The Supreme Court will hear a petition against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, who recently sparked controversy by accusing the Court of driving the nation towards anarchy and blaming CJI Sanjiv Khanna for civil unrest.

Delhi High Court Pulls Up Govt, Police Over No SOP for School Bomb Threats Despite Orders

The Delhi High Court has issued notices to the Delhi government and police for failing to implement an action plan addressing bomb threats in schools. Concerns were raised over repeated hoax threats disturbing students and their families. The court scheduled a follow-up hearing on May 19, 2025, urging authorities to ensure safety protocols.

Supreme Court to Hear Plea on BJP MP Nishikant Dubey’s Remarks Against CJI Sanjiv Khanna; Petition Seeks Removal of Derogatory Videos

New Delhi, April 22 – The Supreme Court of India has agreed to hear next week a petition concerning critical remarks made by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey against the apex court and Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna. The plea also seeks urgent directions to remove viral derogatory videos from social media platforms. The matter was mentioned for urgent listing before a Supreme Court bench comprising Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih.

“CJI Responsible For Civil Wars”: Supreme Court To Hear Contempt Plea Against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Next Week

The Supreme Court Today (April 22) said it will hear a contempt plea next week against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for blaming the CJI for “civil wars in the country.” The Attorney General has not yet granted permission to proceed with the case.

Nishikant Dubey’s Remarks Against CJI | “Go To Attorney General. Don’t Need Our Nod To File Contempt Plea”: Supreme Court To Petitioner

Supreme Court Today (April 21) asked a lawyer to seek the Attorney General’s permission before filing contempt charges against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. The case involves Dubey’s controversial statement blaming CJI Sanjiv Khanna for “all civil wars in the country.”

Supreme Court Slams Lawyer for Seeking Sudden Withdrawal of Contempt Plea: “This Isn’t a Joke!”

A lawyer’s abrupt attempt to withdraw a contempt petition sparked a sharp rebuke from the Supreme Court bench Today (April 2). Justice Sanjay Kumar stressed that contempt cases involve the court’s dignity and can’t be taken lightly.

Supreme Court on Demolition Case: No Relief Against Gujarat Authorities, Petitioner Can Approach HC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday, 3rd March, refused to entertain a petition seeking contempt action against Gujarat authorities for allegedly disobeying its orders regarding demolition of properties. The petitioner alleged that authorities in Ahmedabad demolished houses without following the Supreme Court’s directions.

Rs 50 Lakh & Apology| Delhi High Court Gives TMC Leader Saket Gokhale Last Chance to Reply in Contempt Case

New Delhi, Feb 28 – The Delhi High Court has given Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Saket Gokhale a final opportunity to respond to a contempt petition filed by former diplomat Lakshmi Murdeshwar Puri. Justice Dharmesh Sharma granted two more weeks for Gokhale to submit his reply and scheduled the next hearing for April 18. The court warned that if he failed to respond, he might be required to appear in person.

“Will Be In Possession Of Land Where Demolitions Took Place, Not Be Allocated to Any Third Party”: Gujarat Govt Tells SC

The Supreme Court today (25th Oct) declined a request for an interim status quo on the demolition of Muslim religious structures in Gujarat, informed by the state’s assurance that the land will remain government-owned. Ongoing legal disputes include challenges to earlier court decisions and concerns over alleged unauthorized demolitions impacting recognized sites. Further hearings are scheduled.

“Playing With Students’ Lives For Personal Grouse”: Delhi HC Summons DU Registrar, Dean In Contempt Plea By St Stephen’s College

Yesterday, On 8th October, the Delhi High Court held Delhi University guilty of “wilful disobedience” regarding a contempt plea from St. Stephen’s College, which accused DU of prejudicing student admissions due to personal disputes. The court summoned DU officials to explain their actions, stressing the need to protect students’ futures and comply with prior orders.