Today(30th Sept),The Supreme Court of India has ordered a “status quo” on ongoing evictions and demolitions in Assam’s Sonapur region following a contempt petition from residents claiming violations of the court’s interim order. The petition, submitted by 48 residents, seeks judicial relief against what they describe as illegal evictions by the Assam government.
The Jharkhand High Court ruled that the state cannot suspend internet services during examinations without prior court permission, emphasizing that such actions violate fundamental rights. The court criticized the government’s justification for the broader shutdown, suggesting it constituted contempt of court and lacked factual basis, undermining public convenience and judicial authority.
The Jharkhand government petitioned the Supreme Court over the Central government’s delay in approving the appointment of a new Chief Justice for the state’s High Court. The plea cites the extended delays in previous appointments and highlights concerns about the impact on judicial independence. The intervention of the Supreme Court is sought to address this issue.
The Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to a former Uttar Pradesh principal secretary for providing false statements regarding delays in processing remission applications in the state’s prisons. The Court criticized the official’s inconsistent explanations and emphasized that his actions had jeopardized someone else’s liberty. The case is ongoing, with the Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh instructed to provide an explanation by September 24.
The Kerala High Court convicted sub-inspector VR Rineesh for contempt of court, sentencing him to two months in jail, suspended for a year. The ruling aimed to deter police personnel from disrespecting legal professionals. Despite an apology, the court questioned its sincerity and emphasized the need for immediate and genuine remorse. The case has prompted calls for a fast-track mechanism to address police misconduct.
The Supreme Court fined a Gujarat police officer Rs 25,000 and accepted the judicial magistrate’s unconditional apology in a contempt case involving a wrongful arrest and remand in violation of a bail order. The court criticized the officials’ actions and emphasized the importance of upholding the rule of law. Despite pleas for leniency, the court maintained a firm stance.
![[Kerala Gold Smuggling Case]"What is the Procedure for Indian Govt to Scan a Diplomatic Package?": SC to Centre](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-358.png?resize=447%2C309&ssl=1)
On Tuesday(on 27th August), the Supreme Court of India reprimanded UP’s Principal Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh for submitting misleading affidavits, declaring that dishonesty from IAS officers will not be tolerated. Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih criticized Singh’s false affidavit, despite Additional Advocate General Garima Prasad’s defense of a misunderstanding.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court criticized the UT administration’s “couldn’t care less” attitude towards complying with its orders and warned of “firm measures” if compliance is not ensured. The court has ordered key officials to appear for a hearing today after two of them missed a previous court appearance, leading to the bench’s frustration.
