![[Illegal Tree Felling] "We Hope Delhi Govt. Ceased its Tree Authority Powers": SC Approves Centre's Recommendation to Develop Customized Module in Delhi](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-373.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court has reassigned the contempt case against the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) over tree felling to a bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, previously overseen by Justice Abhay S. Oka. The case will be heard on August 29 by the Chief Justice along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra.
The Supreme Court has requested a response from bar leader Rajiv Khosla regarding a petition by former Delhi district court judge Sujata Kohli, challenging the Delhi High Court’s decision to exonerate Khosla in a contempt case. Khosla’s discharge was based on insufficient evidence to prove guilt. The case will be reviewed in three weeks.
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed a contempt case against the Advocate General and Additional Advocate General due to procedural irregularities. The case arose from alleged misconduct during a virtual hearing. The court stressed the importance of upholding decorum in legal proceedings and highlighted the need for adherence to procedural guidelines. The dismissal drew attention to maintaining the rule of law in court.
![[BREAKING] Ramdev, Patanjali Publish New and 'BIGGER' Apology Today | A Day After SC Rap](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-47-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Following a Supreme Court reprimand, Patanjali co-founders Ramdev and Balkrishna issued a new, more prominent public apology in newspapers, acknowledging their non-compliance with court directions and vowing to rectify their mistakes. The apology addresses misleading advertisements and emphasizes their commitment to abide by the court’s instructions. The court scheduled a hearing on April 30 to review the matter.
The Delhi High Court acquitted former DHCBA President Rajiv Khosla on Wednesday (February 28) in a contempt case filed by ex-District Judge Sujata Kohli due to insufficient evidence. The court emphasized the need to maintain decorum and safety, suggesting video conferencing and enforcing Section 327 Cr.P.C. The verdict was directed to all District Courts of Delhi for proper courtroom conduct and security measures.
The Karnataka High Court has initiated a criminal contempt case against lawyer M. Veerabhadraiah for disruptive behavior, including throwing files, shouting at the judge, and refusing to argue the case on its merits. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining decorum and respect in the courtroom. The incident occurred during proceedings related to the case titled Sri Annadurai vs. GOI and Ors.
Sampath Kumar received a 15-day jail sentence from the Madras High Court for making defamatory comments about MS Dhoni. However, the Supreme Court intervened, staying the sentence and highlighting the delicate balance between freedom of expression and individual reputation in Indian law. The case continues to attract attention as it unfolds.
