Today, On 17th October, the Supreme Court will announce its ruling on the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, related to citizenship for immigrants in Assam from 1966 to 1971. The decision could significantly impact the interpretation of citizenship within India and shape regional and national interests.
A PIL petition filed today in the Madras High Court challenges the Hindi and Sanskrit names given to three new laws replacing the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Indian Evidence Act. The petitioner argues that naming these critical laws in Hindi and Sanskrit could pose challenges for non-Hindi speakers and infringement upon the rights of legal professionals.
![[Maratha Reservation Disputes] Bombay HC Criticizes Reckless Pleadings](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-12-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 1st July, The Bombay High Court criticized the reckless pleadings in petitions challenging the Maratha reservation, emphasizing their significant impact on the state’s population. The court commenced final hearings on the matter, reviewing the constitutional validity of the 10% reservation and considering the inclusion of the Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission. Some petitioners argue against the Maratha community’s qualification as a backward group and the state’s reservation cap.
The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the abrogation of Article 370, dismissing all review petitions. The ruling validates the central government’s action and solidifies Jammu and Kashmir’s integration into the Indian Union. The decision has far-reaching implications and signifies a crucial development in India’s constitutional and political landscape.
The Supreme Court of India on 15th May, emphasized that arrests in Goods and Services Tax (GST) cases should be founded on credible evidence, not mere suspicion. The court highlighted the need for cautious exercise of arrest powers and stressed that arrests should be supported by substantial material. The bench aims to scrutinize arrest grounds outlined in relevant legislation.
Today (9th April): The Gujarat High Court upheld the Constitutional Validity of the Gujarat Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 2020, and its associated rules. Over 150 petitions challenging the law’s validity were dismissed, as the Court found the Act to align with constitutional provisions, not contradict central laws, and not violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
Today(on 9th May), The Supreme Court has adjourned the challenge to the passport law provision and one-year passport issuance for accused individuals with a court-issued ‘no objection certificate’ until after summer vacations. Lawyer Prashant Bhushan’s plea questions the constitutionality of these measures, arguing that they violate the right to equality. The outcome holds significance for individuals facing criminal charges seeking to travel.
On 7th of March: The Supreme Court has accepted a plea by priests of the Sri Veerabhadra Swamy Temple in Telangana, contesting the State’s control of temple administration. The plea challenges the Telangana Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act 1987, asserting it violates religious freedom. The interim relief involves a stay on appointing an executive officer pending the court’s decision.