Today, On 8th April, The All India Association of Jurists filed a petition in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The petition argues that the Act infringes upon fundamental rights and violates constitutional principles. It raises concerns over increased government control and the inclusion of non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards. The case is expected to prompt a significant judicial review of the newly enforced legislation.
Today, On 8th April, The Central Government has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court concerning petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. The caveat requests that no order be passed without first hearing the government’s side. This legal move ensures the Centre’s participation in any proceedings related to the Act. It reflects the government’s proactive stance amid growing legal scrutiny.
Today, On 8th April, The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, came into effect on April 8, 2025, after being passed by Parliament and receiving the President’s assent. The Act introduces key reforms in the governance of waqf properties across India. It aims to enhance transparency, prevent misuse, and improve administrative efficiency. The Ministry of Minority Affairs has issued an official notification confirming its enforcement.
A fresh plea has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act, 2025. The petition argues that the Act amounts to a “blatant intrusion into the rights of a religious group to manage its own affairs concerning religion.” It claims the legislation violates Article 26 of the Constitution, which guarantees religious denominations autonomy in religious matters. The court is yet to list the matter for detailed hearing.
AAP MLA moved the Supreme Court challenging the Waqf Amendment Bill, following similar opposition from Congress and AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi. The bill seeks to amend the Waqf Act of 1995, which governs the administration of Waqf properties across India. Opposition parties have raised concerns over its potential impact on minority rights and property management. The legal challenge reflects growing resistance to the bill from multiple political fronts.
Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh urged the government to enact a law for reservation of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes in private educational institutions, in line with the Parliamentary Standing Committee’s recommendations and Article 15(5) of the Constitution, which allows such provisions.
Today, On 27th February, A PIL has been filed in the Nainital High Court questioning the constitutional validity of the UCC Act and its rules. The petition argues that the Act may violate fundamental rights and constitutional principles. The court is expected to examine whether the legislation aligns with legal and democratic frameworks. This challenge could have important legal and societal implications.
The power to grant furlough is usually with the government (executive), but in Delhi, the High Court is hearing a case about this rule. Furlough is a temporary leave from prison given as a right to well-behaved prisoners, while parole is granted in special cases based on need. The Delhi rule is different because the court, not just the government, plays a role in these decisions. This case is important as it may change how furlough is granted in Delhi.
