Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant stressed the necessity of safeguarding free speech, especially for journalists and the media. He emphasized the crucial link between freedom of speech and leading a dignified life, and the courts’ disapproval of attempts to curtail this right. The event also featured discussions on protecting the media’s rights within constitutional limits.
A Delhi court criticized the Enforcement Directorate’s aggressive tactics against private hospital doctors in the Amit Katyal case, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal procedures and citizens’ rights.
On Monday (29th April): The Delhi High Court directed police protection for a transgender candidate filing a nomination for the 2024 Lok Sabha Election, emphasizing equal protection under Article 14 of the Constitution. This came after the candidate faced a life-threatening attack. The court instructed the police to ensure security and facilitate the nomination process in South Delhi.
Today(on 25th April), The Bombay High Court addressed the issue of unauthorized hawkers taking over footpaths and public roads in Mumbai, emphasizing pedestrians’ rights to safe access. The court suggested exploring pop-up markets or mobile vending as solutions to balance the rights of street vendors and pedestrians. The court also urged the BMC to develop a protocol for temporary street vending while maintaining pedestrian safety.
The Supreme Court is set to address 400+ writ petitions on May 1st, challenging penal provisions under five laws. The laws under scrutiny include GST, Customs Act, Companies Act, Black Money Act, and FCRA. Additionally, a bench will address the validity of provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Various pleas question the constitutionality and procedures of these laws.
On Monday (22nd April): The Delhi High Court denied bail to Salim Malik in the Delhi riots case, citing the seriousness of the charges against him. The court emphasized his attendance at meetings where violent activities were discussed, leading to the dismissal of his bail plea. Malik faces allegations under the UAPA and various sections of the IPC.
AIMIM President Asaduddin Owaisi opposes Allahabad High Court’s ruling on Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Act, citing constitutional provisions for educational autonomy under Articles 29 and 30. He questions the UP government’s intentions and vows legal action, emphasizing the cultural and educational significance of madrasas in the Muslim community. Owaisi’s stance sparks a critical debate.
The Kerala government approached the Supreme Court against both the President and the Governor due to delayed bills. They argue that the bills, primarily concerning matters within the State List of the Constitution, should not have been referred to the President by the Governor. The state also points out that the Governor had previously approved […]
The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of individuals arrested under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), emphasizing the need for the Enforcement Directorate to adhere to constitutional norms. The court upheld the requirement for written grounds of arrest to be provided, underscoring the importance of transparency and adherence to legal procedures.
