Today, On 25th November, the Supreme Court dismissed PILs to remove “secular” and “socialist” from the Indian Constitution’s Preamble. The Chief Justice stated that Parliament can amend the Preamble, and the court emphasized that defining these terms is a governmental responsibility. The terms were added in 1976 through the 42nd amendment.
Yesterday, On 19th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea about pre-censorship of films in January, initiated by actor-director Amol Palekar. The case challenges the Cinematograph Act’s regulations, arguing they are outdated. During previous hearings, concerns regarding government regulations and artistic freedom were raised, with the landscape of film censorship in India evolving continually.
Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the complexities of judicial appointments in India, emphasizing the collaboration between the judiciary and government. He addressed concerns over delays, stressing the importance of a robust dialogue and acknowledging the role of multiple stakeholders. Chandrachud maintained that this multi-layered process ensures fairness and upholds judicial independence.
The Supreme Court of India issued a landmark ruling on November 5, determining that not all private property is a community resource. This decision prompted dissent from Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Sudhanshu Dhulia, who criticized the majority’s characterization of prior judicial doctrines, highlighting the importance of dissenting opinions in shaping legal interpretations and promoting transparency.
Today, On 11th November, Justice Sanjiv Khanna will be sworn in as the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11, 2024, succeeding Justice D.Y. Chandrachud. His term lasts until May 13, 2025. Khanna is recognized for significant rulings and aims to improve justice delivery while continuing a family legacy in India’s judiciary.
Justice Surya Kant criticized a 1981 Supreme Court reference questioning the Chief Justice’s authority regarding Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status, labeling it “bad in law.” He emphasized judicial integrity, asserting that a two-judge bench cannot challenge larger bench rulings, and highlighted the Chief Justice’s role in maintaining judicial clarity and authority within the system.
Today, On 5th November, The Supreme Court ruled that not all private properties qualify as community resources under Article 39(b) for State acquisition. Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud led the majority opinion, stating that properties must meet specific criteria. The court’s decision reflects differing judicial views on property rights and State authority, with three judgments delivered in total.
Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, retiring on November 10, clarified that judicial independence does not mean always opposing the government. He criticized pressure groups that demand favorable rulings, emphasizing that true independence requires judges to make unbiased decisions based on law and constitution, resisting manipulation in today’s media-driven society.
Justice B. V. Nagarathna is a distinguished Judge of the Supreme Court of India, known for her significant contributions to jurisprudence. Born in 1962, she transitioned from the Karnataka High Court to the Supreme Court, where she is considered a role model and a potential candidate for Chief Justice, inspiring women in law.
Justice Sanjiv Khanna is set to become the 51st Chief Justice of India on November 11, succeeding CJI D.Y. Chandrachud. Known for pivotal rulings on Article 370 and electoral bonds, Khanna’s appointment marks a significant transition in the Supreme Court’s leadership, reinforcing accountability and transparency in India’s judicial system.