Presidential Reference Verdict 100% Win for the States, Governor Delays No Longer Unchecked: Snr. Adv. Kapil Sibal

Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal said Governor delays are no longer unchecked, calling the Presidential Reference verdict a 100% win for the States. Speaking to the media, he noted it lets States approach the Court over any inordinate delay by a Governor

Grave Assault on Constitution: Two Pakistan Supreme Court Judges Resign After 27th Amendment

Two judges of Pakistan’s Supreme Court resigned just hours after the 27th Constitutional Amendment became law, calling it a “grave assault” on the Constitution. The amendment creates a government-appointed Federal Constitutional Court, raising fears of weakened judicial independence.

Judiciary Not India’s Roadblock, Problem Lies With Government: SCBA President Vikas Singh Slams Sanjeev Sanyal

SCBA President Vikas Singh hits back at economist Sanjeev Sanyal, saying, “Judiciary is not India’s roadblock.” He firmly stated that the real problem lies with the government, not the courts, which play a crucial role in governance.

Judiciary Does Not Obstruct Progress, It Upholds Development and Liberty: Sr Adv Vikas Pahwa Responds to Sanjeev Sanyal on ‘Viksit Bharat’ Claim

Senior Advocate Vikas Pahwa sent a strongly worded letter to Sanjeev Sanyal, member of the PM’s Economic Advisory Council, asserting that the judiciary does not block progress but upholds development, constitutional values, and protects liberty. Earlier, Sanyal called it the biggest hurdle to India’s ‘Viksit Bharat’ goal.

Ex-SC Judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul: “If the Centre Is Dissatisfied with NJAC Act, It Can Enact a New Law”

Former Supreme Court judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul has suggested that the Centre should enact a new law if it is dissatisfied with the striking down of the NJAC Act. He expressed concern over the executive delaying collegium recommendations for judicial appointments. Kaul emphasized the need for timely action to ensure a smooth appointment process. His remarks have reignited discussions on judicial reforms in India.

TN Govt vs Governor Row || ‘Can Governor Withhold Assent Again After Bill Re-Submission?’: SC Frames Questions

Today, On 6th February, A Supreme Court bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan framed key questions in the dispute between the Tamil Nadu government and the Governor over withholding assent to bills. The court is hearing arguments from senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the state. The issue revolves around the Governor’s delay in approving legislation passed by the Assembly. The case highlights ongoing tensions between the state government and the Raj Bhavan.

‘Judicial Vacancies Update in Parliament’: Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal Reports 2 in Supreme Court, 364 in High Courts, 5,245 in District Courts

Today, On 29th November, The Law Minister reported significant judicial vacancies in India: 2 in the Supreme Court, 364 in High Courts, and 5,245 in district courts. He emphasized ongoing efforts to address these shortages, which impact justice delivery. The appointment process involves constitutional articles and collaboration between the Executive, Judiciary, and state governments.

Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues Notice Over Nayab Singh Saini Appointment as Haryana Chief Minister

On 18th March: The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued notices to the Central and Haryana governments following a petition challenging the appointment of Nayab Singh Saini as Chief Minister. The petition questions Saini’s eligibility and the legitimacy of other ministers. The court has scheduled a hearing for April 30 to address these concerns.