![[Defamation Case] Rahul Gandhi Ordered to Attend Bengaluru Court on June 7](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-25.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Rahul Gandhi, Congress leader, faces a defamation case by BJP in Bengaluru court, with CM and deputy granted bail. The case alleges false claims in political ads. Gandhi missed a hearing, citing prior commitments. Congress defends its campaign against alleged corruption, while BJP accuses defamation. Court directs Gandhi to appear on June 7.
![[BREAKING] SC Registry Denies Urgent Listing for Kejriwal's Plea for Extension of Interim Bail](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-1-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (29th May): The Supreme Court of India has denied Arvind Kejriwal’s request for a 7-day extension of interim bail in a corruption case related to the Delhi liquor policy. The court deemed the plea “not maintainable,” citing the option to seek regular bail. Kejriwal’s counsel emphasized health complications and the need for medical examination. Despite plea, the court instructed surrender by June 2.
Today, On 27th May, Ramesh Chennithala filed a petition in the Kerala High Court, challenging recent amendments to the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act, which he believes weaken the anti-corruption body’s independence. The amendments shift decision-making power and alter the qualifications for the Lok Ayukta, undermining its effectiveness. Chennithala contends these changes violate constitutional principles.
The outgoing President of the Supreme Court Bar Association raised concerns about political parties’ influence on bar association elections, urging for impartiality to uphold legal ethics. He congratulated the new President but criticized political involvement in the elections. He also emphasized the need to amend voting rights and secure insurance for junior lawyers, calling for support from major corporations.
![[Amit Shah's Doctored Video Case] High Court Denies Lunch Motion Moved By Delhi Police](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-25-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Telangana High Court rejected the Delhi police’s lunch motion on 9th May, in the Amit Shah morphed video case, allowing further investigation. The court instructed the police to follow due process and approach the lower court for necessary actions. The case involves allegations of doctoring a video clip of Amit Shah, leading to arrests and ongoing investigations by the Delhi and Hyderabad police.
![[PM Modi Hate Speech Case] TN Congress Moves Madras HC Over ECI Inaction](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-12-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (8th May): The Tamil Nadu Congress Committee filed a petition in the Madras High Court, alleging that the Election Commission of India failed to address hate speeches by Prime Minister Modi. They claim Modi made inflammatory, disrespectful, and divisive remarks targeting specific communities, inciting communal tensions and aiming to manipulate votes in favor of the BJP.
Today, 12th April, Prime Minister (PM) Narendra Modi reaffirmed his government’s commitment to upholding the Constitution during an election rally in Rajasthan. He criticized the Opposition’s claims, emphasizing that even Babasaheb Ambedkar couldn’t revoke the Constitution. Modi accused the Congress of obstructing Ambedkar’s honors and attempting to undermine the Constitution. The BJP distanced itself from an MP’s statement about modifying the Constitution.
Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah denied bribery allegations related to the 2023 election manifesto in a court hearing. The petitioner claimed the Congress party’s promises were bribery, but Siddaramaiah’s representative argued lack of evidence and errors in the petition. The court adjourned the hearing until April 18, indicating the case’s significance.
In Karnataka, three individuals were granted bail by the Bengaluru Trial Court for allegedly chanting pro-Pakistan slogans at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly. They must each post a Rs 1 lakh bond and provide two sureties, and comply with travel restrictions and court attendance. The defense argues that their arrest lacked procedural validity. The Court’s decision aligns with guidelines to prevent unnecessary arrests.
Today (12th March): The Delhi High Court has deferred its verdict on the Congress party’s petition seeking a stay on the Income Tax Department’s notice demanding over Rs 105 crore in taxes. The court indicated no apparent flaws in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s ruling. The Congress argued urgency due to the upcoming elections. The party’s frozen accounts were central to the dispute.