NCLAT Dismisses Appeal in Shareholder Class Action Case against Jindal Poly Films

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed Jindal Poly Films Limited’s appeal challenging the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) order admitting a shareholder class action petition and directing issuance of public notice under the Companies Act, 2013, affirming continuation of class action proceedings.

Why Robust Contract Management is Now a Board-Level Priority in Indian Companies?

Robust contract management is becoming a board-level priority in Indian companies as it ensures compliance, mitigates legal and financial risks, enhances operational efficiency, supports strategic planning, leverages digital transformation, and strengthens stakeholder engagement in an evolving regulatory landscape.

Over 1.45 Lakh Contempt Cases Pending: Union Law Ministry Urges All Govt. Departments to Comply With Judicial Orders

NEW DELHI: The Union Law and Justice Ministry has asked all government ministries to improve their compliance with court orders. This step aims to reduce the huge number of pending contempt cases—around 1.45 lakh—in the Supreme Court and High Courts.

ADR’s Plea for EVM Verification|| Supreme Court Defers Hearing To February 11

The Supreme Court postponed the hearing on EVM verification to February 11, following concerns about the Election Commission’s compliance with its earlier directive. The case relates to an application by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) seeking verification of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). The adjournment allows further time to address the compliance issues raised. The matter remains critical for ensuring transparency in the electoral process.

Supreme Court: ‘3,000 Tonnes Of Solid Waste Generated Every Day, It’s Disastrous’, Asks Urgent Action to Address Delhi’s Solid Waste Crisis

The Supreme Court of India on Thursday (19th Dec) expressed serious concerns over Delhi’s solid waste crisis, urging the Delhi government and the Municipal Corporation to submit a detailed affidavit outlining waste management compliance and fire prevention measures at illegal dumping sites. The Court highlighted the urgent need for corrective actions due to rising untreated waste levels.

BREAKING | ANI Vs Wikipedia| Delhi HC Issued Summons To User Who Make ‘Defamatory’ Edits

The Delhi High Court,on Thursday(14th Nov) led by Justice Subramonium Prasad, issued summons to users accused of making defamatory edits on the ANI Wikipedia page. Following a consent order with ANI, Wikipedia agreed to serve summons confidentially without revealing user identities. The next hearing is scheduled for December 16.

“Progressive Realization”: Apex Court Directs Centre To Frame Mandatory Rules Under RPWD Act For Accessibility In Public Spaces

The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, directed the Union government to rectify legal flaws regarding accessibility for disabled individuals under the RPWD Act. The Court emphasized the need for mandatory accessibility rules instead of non-enforceable guidelines, ordering compliance within three months and stakeholder consultations for effective implementation.

‘Non-Functional Fare Meters In Autorickshaws’: Delhi HC Gives Notice to Transport Department

The Delhi High Court addressed a petition regarding non-functional autorickshaw fare meters. The bench ordered the transport department to resolve the issue raised by Anand Mishra within three weeks. Since 2018, fare meters have been inoperative despite legal mandates, prompting the court to demand inspections to ensure compliance with updated fare rules.

SC Stays Decision to Allow “Only Lawyers Physically or Online Present in Court Can Mark Appearance in Official Records”|| Scheduled On Sept 11

The Supreme Court today stayed its decision to record only the appearances of lawyers physically or online during hearings in court orders. Senior Counsel Kapil Sibal raised the issue, leading to a delay in the implementation of the order issued on August 29. The next hearing is scheduled for September 11. The court emphasized that only actively participating lawyers should have their presence recorded.