The Supreme Court Collegium has suggested the appointment of five advocates as judges of the Calcutta High Court. With 29 vacancies, this decision aims to strengthen the court’s functioning.
Justice Harish Tandon from Calcutta High Court is recommended as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court. Collegium praises his competence, experience, and integrity.
The Central Government Today (March 4) confirmed the permanent appointment of Justice Shailesh Pramod Brahme, Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla, and Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain in the Bombay High Court. Justice Manjusha Ajay Deshpande’s term as an additional judge has also been extended for one year.
The Central Government Today (March 4) confirmed four additional judges of the Madras High Court as permanent judges. With this, the court now has 65 judges, leaving 10 vacancies.
The Supreme Court Collegium has suggested the appointment of five advocates as judges of the Calcutta High Court. With 29 vacancies, this decision aims to strengthen the court’s functioning.
The Supreme Court Collegium recommended making four additional judges of the Madras High Court permanent. This decision was taken in a meeting held on Thursday, as confirmed by an official statement.
The Supreme Court Collegium proposed making three Bombay High Court judges permanent while extending Justice Manjusha Deshpande’s term for one more year.
The Supreme Court has recommended five advocates for appointment as judges of the Patna High Court. This decision was made during the Collegium meeting on February 20.
The Supreme Court Collegium is considering a proposal to limit the appointment of judges’ relatives to judicial positions. This move aims to promote fairness and inclusivity in the judiciary, creating opportunities for first-generation lawyers. Experts believe it could enhance diversity and improve representation from underrepresented communities in constitutional courts. The step reflects a growing emphasis on merit-based selections in India’s judicial system.
The Supreme Court collegium started meeting lawyers being considered for High Court judgeship for the first time. To reduce nepotism, they are avoiding recommending candidates who have close relatives in the judiciary and are giving more chances to first-generation lawyers. These meetings help assess candidates’ suitability better. This step aims to make judicial appointments fairer and more transparent.
