The Delhi High Court Today asked the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to provide evidence against Arvind Kejriwal in a money-laundering case. Kejriwal seeks protection from coercive action and challenges the summonses issued to him by the ED. The ED has been given two weeks to respond, and the next hearing is scheduled for April 22.
The Delhi High Court today asked the Enforcement Directorate for a response to Arvind Kejriwal’s petition challenging the summons in an excise policy-related money laundering case. Kejriwal’s lawyer expressed concerns about possible arrest, while the court granted two weeks for the ED to reply. The case stems from alleged anomalies in the Delhi Excise Policy, with Kejriwal denouncing the actions as politically motivated.
Today, the Jharkhand HC Rejected a petition submitted by Ex-CM Hemant Soren, requesting authorization to partake in the assembly’s budget session. A panel led by Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad had deliberated on the issue since February 26, following extensive arguments presented by Senior Counsel Kapil Sibal, representing Soren, and ASG of India SV Raju, acting on behalf of ED.
Former Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren faces serious allegations from the Enforcement Directorate, including illegal land acquisition and unaccounted cash possession. WhatsApp chats with his associate have come to light, implicating him in property dealings and financial irregularities. The court has adjourned the hearing, granting the agency more time for investigation.
The Supreme Court has paused the defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh, linked to the controversy over PM Modi’s educational qualifications. This comes after Gujarat High Court’s ruling and subsequent appeal by Kejriwal. The case involves the use of the RTI Act for political purposes, prompting a significant legal and political discourse.
The Uddhav Thackeray faction of Shiv Sena has challenged the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker’s recognition of the Eknath Shinde-led faction as the legitimate party. The dispute arose from a split in the party, impacting leadership and upcoming elections. This legal battle has significant implications for Maharashtra’s political landscape and the future of Shiv Sena.