During a ceremony, CJI DY Chandrachud suggested that astrological factors could influence case outcomes, recalling a personal experience with a sugar factory dispute. He expressed gratitude to the judiciary and reflected on his journey, including overseeing the Ayodhya dispute, which concluded with a historic verdict allowing Ram Temple construction while allocating land for a mosque.
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), led by President Kapil Sibal, criticized the Supreme Court’s unilateral decisions regarding alterations to the Lady Justice statue and emblem without consultation. The SCBA expressed ignorance about the changes’ rationale and opposed the establishment of a museum in the former Judges’ Library, advocating instead for a library and café for members.
The Supreme Court of India today (22nd Oct) reviewing the constitutionality of the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004, which a High Court previously deemed unconstitutional. The UP government argues for partial review rather than complete dismissal, emphasizing the state’s duty to provide quality education. Concerns over madrasa students’ eligibility for NEET were also discussed.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, at a felicitation event in Kanhersar, revealed he sought divine guidance during the Ayodhya dispute, believing faith facilitates solutions. He noted the case’s complexity and discussed the Supreme Court’s landmark 2019 ruling favoring the Ram temple’s construction, while also assigning a mosque site.
![[EXCLUSIVE] Landmark Judgements by CJI Chandrachud](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Supreme-Court-gets-5-new-judges-CJI-Chandrachud-administers-oath.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud defended the Sabarimala Verdict, asserting that untouchability extends beyond caste under Article 17 of the Indian Constitution. During the MK Nambyar Memorial Lecture, he criticized originalism and emphasized that the Constitution must evolve with societal changes, serving as a foundation for democratic culture rather than rigid rules.
The Supreme Court of India affirmed the constitutional validity of the 10th Schedule, or Anti-Defection Law, originally introduced in 1985, dismissing a plea challenging it. The Court reiterated that the law prevents political instability by disqualifying members who switch parties, thereby upholding parliamentary democracy and accountability.
Actress Swara Bhaskar criticized the Indian judicial system for its delays in bail proceedings, particularly regarding Umar Khalid in the 2020 Delhi riots case, highlighting perceived religious biases. She questioned Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s focus on ceremonial events over urgent justice, emphasizing her privilege as a Hindu compared to Muslim detainees.
On September 18, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud launched an online mediation training portal in New Delhi, developed by NALSA and MCPC. The portal features over 40 hours of training, including lectures and practical sessions, aimed at promoting alternative dispute resolution in India. The pilot phase runs from September 23 to October 6, 2024.
On Friday(13th Sept), Chief Justice DY Chandrachud highlighted the growing role of young Indian lawyers in arbitration, moving away from the traditional preference for retired judges. Speaking at a Supreme Court conference, he noted that this shift reflects India’s expanding legal talent pool, including women, in the field.
The Supreme Court today issued a notice in a PIL for increased awareness of anti-rape laws in schools and society. It responds to rising violence against women, emphasizing the need for effective communication of laws. The petition questions the efficacy of harsh punishments and highlights the importance of transforming societal attitudes through education and awareness.