The Supreme Court cautioned that failing to prioritise the resettlement of ex-servicemen may affect future recruitment in the military. It said such neglect could discourage talented youth from choosing a career in the armed forces.
The Supreme Court on Monday (Dec 9) questioned the Central government for its failure to comply with a direction to issue appointment orders to a visually impaired person and other candidates with disability, who had cleared the Civil Services Examination in 2008. It also issued a contempt of court notice to the Secretary of Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT).
The Supreme Court has directed a fresh medical examination for a civil services candidate rejected in 2014 due to exceeding the prescribed Body Mass Index limit. The court used its special powers to order the rescheduling of the missed test but rejected the plea for direct appointment and seniority benefits, emphasizing the exceptional nature of the case.
The Manipur government informed the Delhi High Court that it would not arrange transportation for students from hill districts to UPSC exam centers outside the state due to security concerns. The Court upheld the government’s decision and stated that they would provide financial assistance to students who opt for centers outside the state, acknowledging the security challenges. UPSC will facilitate the selection of alternative exam centers and share candidate details with the state government. The Court allowed the Petitioner Federation to seek further clarification or modifications if needed.
The Manipur government Today informed the Delhi High Court about the impracticality of holding the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2024 in the state due to security concerns. They suggested allocating exam centers outside Manipur for students. A public interest litigation highlighted the lack of centers in hill districts, imposing financial and logistical burdens on tribal candidates from economically disadvantaged backgrounds.