Justice B V Nagarathna emphasised that preserving the rule of law is central to democracy, stressing that courts must enforce it “without fear or favour, affection or ill will,” upholding impartial justice as their highest constitutional duty.
Today, On 14th August, The Supreme Court criticized the Gujarat government for appealing a High Court ruling favoring a sweeper, questioning the decision and demanding details about the officials involved. This stern stance emphasizes adherence to judicial rulings impacting lower-level employees’ livelihoods, stressing responsible government decision-making. Additionally, it warns against unnecessary delays or challenges, reinforcing the importance of justice and efficiency in governance.
The Bombay High Court on Monday(8th April), urged BMC to extend financial relief to the family of two children who drowned in a poorly secured water tank in a Mumbai public garden. The court expressed concern over the absence of a structured compensation scheme for such incidents, emphasizing the need for accountability and the value of human life.
The Bombay High Court on Thursday(April 4th), addressed a tragic drowning incident, highlighting civic negligence and public safety concerns in Mumbai. It initiated a PIL for compensation in negligence cases, questioning the value placed on human life. The court criticized the BMC’s budgetary constraints as insufficient justification for endangering public safety, emphasizing the need for accountability and comprehensive evaluation.