The Supreme Court will hear Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against a defamation case on Monday. Kejriwal admitted to making a mistake by retweeting a controversial video. The case involves a three-judge bench and revolves around a retweet made by Kejriwal, which the High Court deemed defamatory. The case also highlights the responsibility of public figures in sharing content.
Today, On 5th August, The Central government approved a new one-year term for nine additional judges of the Calcutta High Court starting on August 31, 2024. This decision follows the Supreme Court Collegium’s choice to extend their terms instead of making them permanent judges. It highlights the complexity of judicial appointments in India and aims to ensure continuity while evaluating permanent appointments.
The Supreme Court Collegium recommended Advocate Bibhu Datta Guru and Advocate Amitendra Kishore Prasad for judgeship in the Chhattisgarh High Court, citing their suitability based on age and standing at the Bar. The recommendation followed the Chief Justice of the Chhattisgarh High Court’s endorsement, with the Chief Minister and Governor of Chhattisgarh in agreement.
![[Cash-for-Vote Scam] SC Dismisses Pleas, Grants Relief to Andhra Pradesh CM Chandrababu Naidu](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-2024-07-19T133304.991.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 19th July, The Supreme Court postponed Andhra Pradesh’s plea against Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu’s bail in the skill development scam case by two weeks. The case involves alleged mismanagement of funds in a state-run initiative, with the government expressing concerns about Naidu’s potential influence on the case’s outcome. The plea challenges the legality of Naidu’s bail.
The Supreme Court directed the Telangana government to replace Justice L. Narasimha Reddy following disapproval of his public statements. The former Chief Justice’s declaration of his intent to probe led to criticism and a request for a different judge. This decision came during a hearing of a petition filed by former Chief Minister K. Chandrashekhar Rao.
![[Delhi Excise Policy] 'Previously Obtained Sanction Under Secttion 197 CrPC To Prosecute Arvind Kejriwal': ED Tells Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Kejriwal-vs-ED.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today(on 15th July),The Delhi High Court has scheduled a hearing for August 7 on the Enforcement Directorate’s plea challenging Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s bail in a money laundering case linked to an alleged excise scam. The court previously stayed the trial court’s bail order, and Kejriwal’s counsel requested additional time to file a reply, citing the Supreme Court’s interim bail granted on Friday.
Today, On 12th July, AAP celebrates the Supreme Court’s interim bail for Delhi CM Kejriwal, expressing relief and support. Meanwhile, BJP criticizes the decision, stating interim bail does not imply innocence. The case regarding Kejriwal’s ED arrest is referred to a larger bench by the Supreme Court, with the verdict reserved for May 17. Kejriwal’s arrest is linked to a corruption case concerning the Delhi liquor policy scam.
The Supreme Court today appointed former Chief Justice UU Lalit to lead a committee overseeing the appointments of Vice-Chancellors for public universities in West Bengal. This move aims to resolve the dispute between the state government and the Governor over the final authority for these appointments. Justice Lalit will form sub-committees and receive compensation accordingly.
Yesterday, On 6th July, The Delhi court denied Arvind Kejriwal’s request for his wife to be present during his medical check-up, citing that it contradicts prison regulations and could set a precedent against the rules. Despite this, the court approved his petition for access to medical records and allowed his wife to contact the medical board or doctors directly.
The Telangana High Court ordered a lower court to expedite the complaint filed by a BJP leader against Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy, for alleged remarks against the BJP during the Lok Sabha election campaign. The directive aims to speed up the judicial process, instructing the court to conduct proceedings promptly.