The Gujarat High Court was informed on Friday that the state plans to reclaim about 108 hectares of grazing land from Adani Ports and SEZ Ltd, allocated in 2005. Villagers had contested the allocation, arguing that it left them with insufficient grazing land. The state has committed to replenishing 129 hectares of land for the village’s use.
Yesterday, 1st May, The Gujarat High Court addressed a PIL concerning the use of glue traps, focusing on the inhumane treatment of animals and the public health risks they pose. The court highlighted the failure to enforce existing laws prohibiting these traps and mandated responses from relevant authorities. The issue will be further examined in a follow-up hearing on July 5.
Today, On 1st May, GNLU’s Registrar apologized for downplaying rape and harassment allegations at the university, following widespread criticism and court intervention. The Gujarat High Court acknowledged the apology and made recommendations for improving the Internal Complaints Committee. They emphasized the need for male representation in the committee and proposed the establishment of a complaint box managed by an independent secretariat.
Today, 30th April, The Gujarat High Court declined an urgent hearing for a Public Interest Litigation challenging the uncontested election of a BJP candidate in Surat. Chief Justice Agarwal emphasized adherence to established legal procedures for election grievances, rejecting the use of PILs for election disputes. This case raises important questions about fair electoral processes and democratic perception.
Today, On 25th April, The Gujarat High Court initiated an investigation into the former Vadodara civic chief’s involvement in a boat tragedy, where 12 students and 2 teachers died. The court highlighted irregularities in awarding the project to Kotia Projects and doubts about their qualification. The inquiry aims to uncover administrative and ethical misconduct.
Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal opposes the transfer of part-heard cases between benches, emphasizing that once a case is assigned to a specific bench, the Chief Justice cannot reallocate it. She intends to address this issue with the Full Court to find a permanent solution, aiming to maintain consistency and follow established rules.
Today(12th March),The Gujarat High Court, led by Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Aniruddha Mayee, strongly rejects the lackadaisical “Chalta Hai” mindset of State officials in legal documentation, especially affidavit filings. The court emphasizes the crucial nature of precise and thorough legal filings, refusing to tolerate inadequacies and highlighting the need for adherence to established protocols.
![[Rajkot Game Zone Fire Incident] Gujarat HC Raps State Govt, Demands Accountability](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/gujarat-hc-1.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Gujarat HC Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal criticizes emotional manipulation in a temple demolition case, highlighting a broader issue of encroachment on public property. The case involves 93 households opposing a public road project, emphasizing emotional attachment to the temple. The Chief Justice extended interim protection against demolition, with the next hearing scheduled for March 14.
The Gujarat High Court criticized the state government for a vague report on unauthorized religious structures in public spaces, demanding a more detailed affidavit. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of clarity on actions taken against these structures, highlighting the need for compliance with Supreme Court directives. Government’s response was deemed unsatisfactory, and a comprehensive affidavit is now required by February 27.