The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s mandate for judicial officer promotions, requiring a minimum 50% interview score. It dismissed challenges to the criterion, affirming the High Court’s autonomy. The ruling emphasizes the importance of merit and competency in judicial appointments, setting a significant precedent for India’s legal system.
!["National Wealth Redistribution Proposal is 'Juvenile'": SG | 9-Judge Bench | Nature of Private Property [Day 4]](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/image-106.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
New Delhi, January 16: Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, in a significant observation, highlighted the pressing issue of mediocrity within the district judiciary. During a hearing on Tuesday, January16, he emphasized the urgent need for implementing effective measures to ensure the recruitment of competent individuals in the judiciary. This statement came in the backdrop […]
The Supreme Court’s courtrooms have undergone significant technological upgrades, including the installation of advanced screens and state-of-the-art video conferencing facilities. These enhancements are part of the court’s broader e-initiatives aimed at modernizing the judicial system In an innovative and environmentally conscious move, Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud has been at the forefront of transforming […]
In a significant development addressing the aftermath of violence in Manipur, the Supreme Court of India has taken proactive measures to ensure the safety and rights of those affected, especially in light of the upcoming Christmas festivities. The bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, […]
The Supreme Court of India is currently engaged in a comprehensive reassessment of its 2018 judgment regarding the automatic expiry of stay orders in civil and criminal cases. This pivotal decision, originally made in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency P. Ltd. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation, mandated that interim stay orders by […]
In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court of India has set a new precedent in arbitration law, significantly impacting the enforceability of arbitration clauses in contracts. This ruling, delivered by a seven-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, addresses the contentious issue of whether arbitration clauses in unstamped or inadequately stamped agreements […]
The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has stated that the Chief Secretary of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, though appointed by the Central Government, must adhere to the directions of the Delhi Government on matters within its executive competence. This judgment, pronounced by a bench led by Chief […]
The Supreme Court of India is poised to pronounce a historic judgment on December 11, addressing the highly debated abrogation of Article 370, which led to the revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. This impending verdict follows an intense and prolonged legal examination of the Union Government’s 2019 decision, which has been […]
Scrutinizes Citizenship Act Section 6A (Day -3) In a pivotal development, the Supreme Court of India has issued a directive to the Union Government, seeking detailed information on the issue of illegal migration to Assam and other North-Eastern states post-March 25, 1971. This order is a significant step in the ongoing legal scrutiny of Section […]
In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has clarified the scope of the “group of companies” doctrine in arbitration, significantly impacting how arbitration agreements are interpreted and enforced. The Court’s decision, delivered by a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices Hrishikesh Roy, PS Narasimha, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, establishes […]