Today, On 28th March, The Centre notified the transfer of Justices Yashwant Varma and Chandra Dhari Singh to the Allahabad High Court. This decision is part of the latest judicial reshuffle, impacting high-ranking judges. While the transfers are officially administrative, they have drawn attention due to recent controversies. The move highlights ongoing changes within the Indian judiciary.
A fire broke out in the outhouse of Justice Yashwant Varma’s home, On March 14, where a large amount of cash was reportedly found. This incident has led to many doubts and concerns about what really happened. Officials have not yet explained where the money came from or why it was there. As more questions arise, the issue is getting a lot of attention from the public and legal experts.
The Supreme Court’s full court has decided to take away senior lawyer Rishi Malhotra’s senior designation. The main reason for this action was his alleged “sharp practices” in legal matters. A member who attended the meeting confirmed that these questionable practices were the key issue discussed. This move highlights the court’s strict stand against unethical behavior in the legal profession.
The Supreme Court granted NewsClick a one-week protection from any coercive action over a tax demand. A bench led by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, however, rejected a writ petition filed by PPK Newsclick Studio Pvt Ltd. The petition was filed directly under Article 32 of the Constitution. The court’s decision provides temporary relief but does not settle the tax dispute.
Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna highlighted the vital role of Advocates-on-Record (AORs) in the legal system, urging them to balance professional and social responsibilities. He advised new AORs to take up cases that sustain their livelihood while also contributing to society. The Supreme Court, he emphasized, holds high expectations from them. His remarks highlighted the importance of legal service beyond personal gain.
Today, On 24th January, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay challenging the constitutionality of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provisions. The petition argued that TDS imposes undue administrative and financial burdens on taxpayers. However, the court rejected these concerns, emphasizing the importance of TDS in ensuring tax compliance. This decision reinforces the legal validity of the current TDS framework.
A group of UPSC aspirants challenged the age limit cut-off of August 1 in letters to the Chief Justice of India (CJI). They argue that the cut-off date is unfair, as it discriminates against candidates born in the same year but just a few months or days apart. The aspirants claim this policy denies them equal opportunities. They have urged the CJI to address this issue in the interest of fairness.
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court’s designation of 70 lawyers as Senior Advocates. Following the designation process, a committee member resigned, alleging the final list was altered without his approval. The Supreme Court’s response will address concerns about the transparency of the designation process.
Kabil Sibal and Tushar Mehta have expressed concerns about pollution in Delhi NCR, stating it is “getting out of control.” They have called for virtual court proceedings to address the issue more effectively. The plea highlights the urgency of managing the environmental crisis in the region. The two legal experts seek a more efficient way […]