On November 7, the Supreme Court will rule on the five-year Jet Airways ownership dispute between Jalan Kalrock Consortium and creditors led by SBI. JKC claims ownership while creditors request liquidation. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud will deliver the decision before his retirement on November 10, indicating potential impacts on India’s aviation sector.
Bollywood actress Swara Bhaskar criticized Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s comments on the Ayodhya Ram Temple decision, calling them “terrible.” She questioned his reliance on divine intervention for judicial resolutions, echoing sentiments from the Shiv Sena (UBT). The controversy highlights concerns over the intersection of faith and legal decision-making in the judiciary.
The Supreme Court of India, today (21st Oct)led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, dismissed a petition by Dr. SN Kundra aimed at replacing “Hindutva” with “Bharatiya Samvidhanatva.” The court deemed the plea a “complete abuse of the process,” reflecting hesitation to alter foundational political concepts, despite concerns over religious nationalism’s impact on governance.
Chief Justice DY Chandrachud highlighted the detrimental effects of child marriage, stressing the need for dedicated Child Marriage Prohibition Officers (CMPOs) to enact prevention measures effectively. The Supreme Court mandated measures such as exclusive CMPO appointments, public reporting portals, and fast-track courts to enhance enforcement, protect minors, and ultimately uphold children’s rights in India.
![[Rajasthan Civil Judge Exam] "Answer Sheets of English Essays Scoring Below 15 Marks to be Produced Before Court": CJI](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-40-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 18th October, the Chief Justice of India ordered the submission of English essay answer sheets scoring below 15 marks from the Rajasthan Civil Judge Exam, addressing fairness concerns. The Supreme Court will review petitions challenging the evaluation process, emphasizing transparency and the impact of low scores on candidates’ eligibility in this competitive examination.
![[BREAKING] Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Section 6A of Citizenship Act in 4:1 verdict](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/image-1-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 17th October, the Supreme Court upheld Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, confirming its constitutionality concerning citizenship for migrants in Assam who arrived before 1971. This significant ruling, derived from the Assam Accord, has three separate opinions, reflecting ongoing debates on citizenship and regional issues in India.
Today, On 17th October, the Supreme Court will announce its ruling on the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, related to citizenship for immigrants in Assam from 1966 to 1971. The decision could significantly impact the interpretation of citizenship within India and shape regional and national interests.
![[RG Kar Rape-Murder] "Nice Way To Confer Political Backing": CJI Seeks Detailed Report From WB Govt. On Engagement Of Civic Volunteers](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/img-2-2.png?resize=447%2C252&ssl=1)
Today, On 15th October, the Supreme Court of India criticized the recruitment of civic police volunteers in West Bengal, raising concerns about political influence in law enforcement. The court sought comprehensive details from the state regarding these volunteers, their qualifications, and deployment, amid ongoing investigations into the rape and murder of a trainee doctor.
Today, On 14th October, the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition from the Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust regarding land acquisition by the Uttar Pradesh government, citing no legal issues with prior rulings. The court emphasized concerns about educational provisions for 300 affected students and noted allegations of misuse of power in land allotment.
Today, On 3rd October, the Supreme Court upheld the tax department’s position, confirming that updated Income Tax Act provisions from April 1, 2021, must be applied. This ruling affects approximately 90,000 reassessment notices issued during the pandemic, resolving conflicts between old and new laws and setting precedents for future tax disputes and limitations.