Former locomotive pilot, PU Venkatesan, was convicted of criminal contempt for making scandalous allegations against judges. The Madras High Court sentenced him to six months in prison for displaying no remorse and verbally abusing the judges. His behavior was found to be contemptuous towards the entire justice system. This followed a Facebook post and subsequent letters making reckless allegations.
![[NEET UG 2024 Controversy] NTA Seeks Transfer of All HC Cases to SC: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-92.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The National Testing Agency (NTA) plans to request the Supreme Court to consolidate NEET UG 2024 cases to prevent conflicting rulings in multiple high courts. The controversy involves alleged question paper leaks, grace marks, and multiple correct answers. Candidates raised concerns about irregularities in marking and a significant uproar followed the announcement of results on June 4, 2024.
![[BREAKING] SC Extended Deadline For AAP To Vacate Delhi Office Premise By 10th August](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-65.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court today highlighted a shortage of courtrooms and emphasized that the land allotted for the AAP office has not been used. The Supreme Court extended the deadline for AAP to vacate its office to August 10, granting an additional extension due to pending elections. The court directed AAP to seek alternative land.
Today, On 6th May, The Supreme Court extended the stay on the CBI probe into the Bengal School Jobs Scam until May 7. The decision follows the appeal by the West Bengal government against the annulment of teacher appointments by Calcutta High Court. The case involves allegations of fraudulent selection procedures, prompting a call for CBI investigation.
Today, On 6th May, The Chief Justice of India has agreed to hear a plea about potential side effects of the Covishield COVID-19 vaccine. Concerns include Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS), cardiovascular risks, and myocarditis. A petition seeks an expert panel to investigate the side effects and compensation for affected individuals. AstraZeneca faces lawsuits over TTS, but regulatory authorities emphasize the vaccine’s benefits.
Today, 29th April, The Chief Justice of India (CJI) led bench recalled an order permitting abortion for a 14-year-old rape survivor. The decision follows legal proceedings and considerations surrounding the case. This development highlights the complexities and legal intricacies involved in such sensitive matters within the Indian judicial system.
On Friday (19th April), CJI Chandrachud expressed pride in casting his first vote, stressing responsible voting. He emphasized the symbolic significance of the ink mark, symbolizing fulfillment of citizenship duties. He urged citizens not to miss the chance to vote responsibly, encouraging pride in participating in the democratic process and reminding them of the upcoming elections.
![[Nithari Killings Case]| Supreme Court to Hear Plea Against Acquittal](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-43-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today,19th April,The Supreme Court sought responses on labeling the CAA rules as “Anti-Constitutional,” addressing concerns of fairness and constitutionality. Petitioner Hiren Gohain argues that the rules lead to demographic shifts and infringe upon fundamental rights. The plea aims to protect the rights of the indigenous population in Assam, emphasizing the urgent issue of illegal migration.
Today,14th April,On Dr. B.R. Ambedkar’s 134th birth anniversary, Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and other dignitaries paid tribute at the Supreme Court, recognizing his pivotal role in shaping India’s constitution and advocating for social change. PM Narendra Modi also honored Ambedkar’s legacy, emphasizing his inspiration for disadvantaged individuals and his fight against social discrimination and for equal rights.
The State Bank of India (SBI) refused to disclose legal fees paid to Senior Advocate Harish Salve in the Electoral Bond Case, citing RTI Act sections 8(1)(e) and (j). The refusal led to concerns about transparency and accountability in financial transactions linked to significant legal matters. Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench instructed SBI to reveal all details related to Electoral Bonds, including purchasers’ names and purchase dates, due to concerns about transparency and accountability.