Today, On 28th January, The Chief Justice of India (CJI) agreed to consider an urgent hearing for a plea accusing Manipur Chief Minister Biren Singh of involvement in organizing violence in the state. The petition seeks a court-monitored investigation by an SIT into leaked audio clips allegedly implicating the CM.
On November 9, 2024, a ceremonial bench will honor CJI D.Y. Chandrachud on his final working day, marking his impactful tenure focused on judicial transparency, inclusivity, and technological advancement. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, his successor, is expected to continue these reforms while addressing current judicial challenges. Chandrachud’s legacy will shape future judicial practices.
![[BREAKING] "Statutory Creation Doesn't Nullify Minority Status Of AMU': Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/AMU.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will announce its judgment on November 8 about Aligarh Muslim University’s minority status. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal argued that questioning this status may threaten India’s secular nature. He emphasized that AMU’s administration does not require a majority of Muslims or Christians to retain its minority classification, highlighting historical and legal context.
Former SCBA President Vikas Singh has raised concerns to Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud regarding the Supreme Court’s decision to convert the Judges’ Library into a museum. He argues this undermines the needs of SCBA members, who lack essential facilities, and urges reconsideration of infrastructure plans to support the Bar’s critical role in the judicial process.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition regarding lawyers’ mental health, urging Bar Associations to provide support instead of seeking court intervention. The Chief Justice emphasized the importance of proactive measures for mental wellness in the legal profession, highlighting a significant lack of targeted resources in India compared to other countries.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court criticized Uttar Pradesh for unlawfully demolishing a house in 2019, ordering Rs 25 lakh in compensation to the homeowner. The court emphasized the need for lawful procedures in property demolition and directed an investigation into the involved officials, reinforcing citizens’ rights against arbitrary state actions.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court ruled that holders of a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) license can drive transport vehicles weighing up to 7,500 kg. This decision clarifies the LMV classification, benefiting professionals using these vehicles. The ruling addresses discrepancies in the Motor Vehicles Act, recognizing the implications for gig workers reliant on LMV licenses.
Today, On 6th November, the Supreme Court of India is set to rule on whether a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) license allows drivers to operate small transport vehicles under 7,500 kg. This ruling addresses legal uncertainties impacting insurance claims in accidents, with implications for numerous drivers and insurers nationwide, following conflicting court decisions.
Today, On 5th November, Justice B.V. Nagarathna criticized Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for his remarks about former judges, emphasizing that the Supreme Court’s institution transcends individual judges. She argued past judges should not be criticized for differing viewpoints, as their rulings aligned with the historical context of their times. Future judges should avoid unjust criticisms.
Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, retiring on November 10, clarified that judicial independence does not mean always opposing the government. He criticized pressure groups that demand favorable rulings, emphasizing that true independence requires judges to make unbiased decisions based on law and constitution, resisting manipulation in today’s media-driven society.