The Supreme Court today rejected Divya Spandana’s plea to dismiss a defamation case against Asianet News Network and journalist Vishweshwar Bhat. Spandana filed the lawsuit over allegations implicating her in a betting and spot-fixing scandal, claiming her name was repeatedly mentioned during the telecasts. Both the Karnataka High Court and the Supreme Court upheld the decision not to quash the proceedings.
Today, 29th July, Supreme Court announced it may soon deliver a verdict on the Delhi government’s plea challenging the Lieutenant Governor’s authority to nominate aldermen to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD). The plea contests the decision to nominate members without the council of ministers’ aid and advice. The standing committee of the MCD, including 18 members, is currently non-functional.
![[Day-1 Lok Adalat] SC Commences Special Lok Adalat, Allows Media Cameras Inside Courtrooms](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Screenshot-2024-07-08-143020.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today commenced a special week-long Lok Adalat, allowing media cameras inside courtrooms for the first time. Its aim is to settle pending cases and reduce backlog, with the first seven benches participating. The Chief Justice encouraged lawyers to bring suitable cases for amicable resolution, emphasizing the benefits of this informal, technology-driven method.
![[Breaking] CJI Extends Stay on Notices Issued by LS Pivileges Panel to West Bengal Officials Till Jul 19](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-40-2.png?resize=400%2C300&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today extended the stay on notices summoning West Bengal officials until July 19 due to the unavailability of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta. The notices were related to an alleged breach of privilege by them regarding their response to a complaint filed by a BJP MP. The court will continue addressing the plea on July 19.
The Supreme Court today granted relief to Power TV, criticizing the High Court’s decision as political vendetta and emphasizing the protection of freedom of speech and expression. The case involves the sex abuse allegations against former JDS MP Prajwal Revanna. The Supreme Court issued notices to the Union government and others, scheduling further hearings.
The Supreme Court today summoned chief and finance secretaries of 16 states for failing to implement pension and retirement benefit recommendations for judicial officers. The court emphasized the necessity of their personal presence to facilitate the submission of affidavits and warned of potential contempt proceedings for non-compliance. August 23 is set for a hearing on this matter, with no further extensions granted.
Today(on 4th July), Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud urged SEBI and SAT to exercise caution in the face of surging equity markets, highlighting the need for additional tribunal benches to stabilize operations. He emphasized the pivotal role of regulatory bodies in maintaining market stability and stressed the urgency of addressing the increased workload and pending appeals at SAT.
Today, On 2nd May, In the Supreme Court, a significant case concerning the promotion of judicial officers has emerged, sparking widespread interest, the appointment of senior civil judges as additional district and sessions judges and the interpretation of Rule 5(1)(1). Suspension of promotions and calls for a Constitution bench highlight the case’s significance. The court also seeks clarification on promotion criteria, emphasizing the importance of interpreting rules.
Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud on 23rd April noted the situation where tenants hold onto properties and landlords struggle with maintenance costs.The Supreme Court is reviewing a Maharashtra law aimed at acquiring old, unsafe buildings where tenants refuse to vacate and landlords lack funds for repairs.
![[Breaking] Supreme Court Strikes Down Haryana's 5-Marks Reservation in Employment Exams](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/image-16-1.png?resize=447%2C309&ssl=1)
Today,18th April,The Supreme Court postponed its ruling on industrial alcohol regulation, causing uncertainty in the industry. The decision revolves around the overlapping powers of the Centre and states. The nine-judge bench is reviewing the matter, which stems from conflicting interpretations of legislative competence. The final judgment’s implications for the industry remain pending.