The Supreme Court stated that no law made by Parliament or a state legislature can be termed contempt of court. Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma made this remark while deciding a 2012 contempt plea.
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul discussed the judiciary’s role in governance and judicial independence in a recent interview. He emphasized the importance of checks and balances, shared insights on his rapport with former Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, and expressed concerns over a reassigned case regarding judicial appointments, asserting he should have presided over it.
![[Illegal Tree Felling] "No Satisfactory Progress Made In Terms Of What Court Expected: Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/AS-OKA.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court, led by Justice Abhay S. Oka, raised concerns about the filing of false cases impacting the judicial system’s integrity. Highlighting recent patterns of misconduct, the Court plans to implement guidelines for enhanced scrutiny in case filings. Discussions will focus on advocate conduct and the senior designation process, with further reviews scheduled.
Yesterday, On 19th November, The Supreme Court will hear a plea about pre-censorship of films in January, initiated by actor-director Amol Palekar. The case challenges the Cinematograph Act’s regulations, arguing they are outdated. During previous hearings, concerns regarding government regulations and artistic freedom were raised, with the landscape of film censorship in India evolving continually.
Former Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the complexities of judicial appointments in India, emphasizing the collaboration between the judiciary and government. He addressed concerns over delays, stressing the importance of a robust dialogue and acknowledging the role of multiple stakeholders. Chandrachud maintained that this multi-layered process ensures fairness and upholds judicial independence.
During an event, a report by the Esya Centre analyzed the potential effects of the proposed Digital Competition Bill on consumer welfare and digital markets. Supreme Court judge Hima Kohli stressed the importance of aligning the bill with constitutional principles and addressing critical challenges in the digital market. She highlighted the need for industry concerns and balancing regulation with innovation.