OpenAI Faces Copyright Lawsuit from Global Publishers in India: “Stop OpenAI from Accessing Copyright Content”

The Federation of Indian Publishers filed a copyright case against OpenAI in the Delhi High Court. This adds to a similar ongoing case at the same court, highlighting concerns over the use of copyrighted material by AI systems. The publishers allege unauthorized use of their content, raising questions about intellectual property rights in the digital age.

[ANI vs. OpenAI] OpenAI Informed India Court Selective Data Deletion Used For Its ChatGPT Service Violates US Legal Obligations

OpenAI has informed an Indian court that any directive to delete training data used for its ChatGPT service would conflict with its legal obligations under U.S. law, according to a recent filing referenced by Reuters.

Punjab and Haryana High Court Turns to ChatGPT for DGPS Clarification in Property Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court utilized ChatGPT to evaluate Differential GPS (DGPS) in a property dispute case, emphasizing its precision in demarcation. Justice Gupta endorsed DGPS for its accuracy and efficiency over traditional methods, ultimately dismissing the petitioner’s objections. The ruling showcases the potential of modern technology in enhancing judicial processes and resolving disputes effectively.

[ANI vs. OpenAI] “Unauthorized Use of Its Original News Content”: HC Summons OpenAI for Copyright Violation Allegations

Today, On 19th November, the Delhi High Court summoned OpenAI due to ANI’s allegations of unauthorized use of its copyrighted content by ChatGPT. This lawsuit raises significant issues regarding intellectual property rights and the ethical use of generative AI in content creation, marking a notable legal action by an Indian media organization against AI platforms.

ChatGPT Used by High Court for Research to Pass Order

The Manipur High Court utilized ChatGPT for legal research in a service-related case. Justice A Guneshwar Sharma employed the AI tool to overturn the removal of a Village Defence Force (VDF) member. The court found the removal order to violate principles of natural justice, leading to the immediate reinstatement of the petitioner.