![[Ex-Punjab CM Beant Singh Assassination] "Additional 4 Weeks Granted": SC Directs Centre to Decide on Balwant Singh Rajoana's Mercy Plea](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/image-39.png?resize=300%2C150&ssl=1)
Today, On 18th November, the Supreme Court directed the President’s secretary to present Balwant Singh Rajoana’s mercy petition to President Droupadi Murmu within two weeks. Rajoana, sentenced to death for the 1995 assassination of Punjab Chief Minister Beant Singh, seeks commutation of his sentence. The case highlights ongoing debates about the death penalty in India.
![[RG Kar Rape & Murder] "I Have Been Framed. I Told the Judge That I Am Innocent": Accused Sanjay Roy](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/DNA-Evidence-Confirms-Sanjay-Roys-Crime-Was-Intoxicated_-CBI-BIG-Revelation-In-RG-Kar-Rape-Murder-Case-_-Times-Now.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The CBI chargesheet in the RG Kar rape and murder case revealed crucial evidence against Sanjoy Roy, linking him to the crime through CCTV footage and forensic findings. The detailed report outlines the victim’s injuries, modus operandi, and the timeline, culminating in Roy’s arrest and upcoming trial set for November 4.
![[PGIMER Convocation] "Your Role as Medical Professionals Goes Beyond Healing": CJI Urges Young Doctors To be Empathetic, Recalls 'Munna Bhai MBBS'](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-48-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
During the convocation at PGIMER, Chandigarh, Chief Justice of India, Justice DY Chandrachud, emphasized the importance of empathy and ethics in medical practice. He drew parallels between medicine and law, highlighting the need for compassion, accessibility to healthcare, and ethical decision-making. He also shared a personal experience to underscore the human aspect of healthcare.
Today, On 2nd August, The Supreme Court called for a separate Debts Recovery Tribunal in Jammu & Kashmir due to its unique topography, despite the option of virtual access to the Chandigarh DRT. This move aims to provide more effective resolution of cases in the region, addressing concerns about access to justice for individuals and businesses.
Today, On 12th July, The Supreme Court granted relief to Chandigarh shooter Manraj Singh Chatha, allowing him to pursue a law degree. Justices advised him not to use a rifle in law practice. The Court upheld the high court’s decision, noting that it would not set a precedent. The case underscores the balance needed in maintaining dual careers and ethical standards.
The Consumer Court ruled in favor of a customer in a dispute against Ajio.com, an e-commerce platform, for failing to deliver ordered items, causing mental distress. The court ordered Ajio.com to refund the customer, compensate for distress, and cover litigation expenses, highlighting the importance of customer protection and prompt issue resolution in e-commerce.
The High Court mandated the adoption of biometric verification, utilizing Aadhaar card authentication, for witnesses across all courts within its jurisdiction, encompassing Haryana, Punjab, and Chandigarh. This directive seeks to curb the widespread misuse of bail procedures facilitated by counterfeit witnesses, an issue that has persisted in these regions.
Credit Suisse Today informed the Supreme Court that SpiceJet settled its dues, avoiding further defaults. Justices scheduled a hearing for July to ensure compliance. The case involves SpiceJet owing $20 million to SR Technics. The court had directed SpiceJet to settle the dues by March 15 and abstain from taking further risks. Previous disputes led to legal action.
The Chandigarh Consumer Commission fined SpiceJet and a travel agent for incomplete refunds on COVID-cancelled flights, despite ministry advisories. Complainants only received partial reimbursements. The commission ordered full refunds with interest and compensation for mental agony and litigation costs, totaling Rs.15,000. The case was titled Prahlad Bhagat Vasudeva and Ors v. SpiceJet Ltd and Anr.
The Delhi High Court today dismissed a plea seeking to alter boundaries and relocate capitals, emphasizing that only Parliament can modify state boundaries. The petitioner’s request to divide the joint High Court for Punjab and Haryana was also rejected as beyond the court’s jurisdiction, citing Article 3 of the Constitution. The PIL was consequently rejected.