Today, On 10th November, The Supreme Court sought the Centre’s response on implementing women’s reservation in Parliament, observing that the Constitution guarantees political and social equality and that women, who form nearly 48 percent of the population, deserve equal political representation and participation.
Today, On 10th January, The Supreme Court dismissed PILs challenging the Women’s Reservation Bill, stating there was no violation of fundamental rights, including Article 14. The petitions questioned the Bill’s constitutional validity and its deferment due to the delimitation clause. The Court clarified that Article 32 jurisdiction cannot be invoked in this case. This decision reaffirms the legislative process for implementing women’s political representation in India.
The Supreme Court of India plans to conduct a tree census in Delhi to address the alarming rate of tree felling, currently five trees per hour. An expert committee will oversee tree removal approvals, with stricter regulations enforced to protect the environment. This pivotal measure underscores the importance of preserving trees for public health and ecological balance.
The Supreme Court Today (Sept 2) refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) petition that called for the conduct of a social and caste-based census. A Bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti pointed out that it was a policy matter in which the top court was not inclined to interfere. “What is this? This is in the domain of governance. What can we do?” Justice Roy asked when the matter was taken up.
Today, 16th April, The Bihar state government defended its caste census initiative in a recent Supreme Court affidavit, aiming to understand socio-economic conditions for marginalized communities and to enhance policies for disadvantaged groups. The government emphasized adherence to constitutional mandates and outlined various initiatives based on the survey report’s findings, such as quota benefits and educational support.
The Kerala government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court, stating it had no plans to conduct a caste survey and emphasized the responsibility of the Central government in conducting such surveys. The government refuted allegations of intentional disobedience and highlighted the challenges in utilizing socio-economic data for policymaking. This case has significant implications for the identification and support of backward classes in Kerala.