• Wed. Feb 4th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: caveat

    BREAKING| Could Lead to Lawlessness If We Do Not Intervene: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Mamata, WB Govt Over ED's Plea
    BREAKING| Could Lead to Lawlessness If We Do Not Intervene: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Mamata, WB Govt Over ED's Plea
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Could Lead to Lawlessness If We Do Not Intervene: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Mamata, WB Govt Over ED’s Plea

    Today, On 15th January, The Supreme Court has issued a notice to Mamata Banerjee and the West Bengal government, warning that the ED’s plea alleging obstruction during I-PAC raids. The apex court remarked that it “could lead to lawlessness if we do not intervene,” signaling stern judicial action.

    author
    ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Was It Jantar Mantar? Supreme Court Slams Chaos in Calcutta High Court
    ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Was It Jantar Mantar? Supreme Court Slams Chaos in Calcutta High Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Was It Jantar Mantar? Supreme Court Slams Chaos in Calcutta High Court

    Today, On 15th January, The Supreme Court slammed the turmoil in the Calcutta High Court during ED proceedings, asking if it resembled Jantar Mantar. The apex court called it a “serious issue” and announced plans to issue a notice in the matter.

    author
    BREAKING| I-PAC Raids Row| Shocking Pattern, CM Banerjee Barges In During Statutory Action: ED Tells Supreme Court
    BREAKING| I-PAC Raids Row| Shocking Pattern, CM Banerjee Barges In During Statutory Action: ED Tells Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| I-PAC Raids Row| Shocking Pattern, CM Banerjee Barges In During Statutory Action: ED Tells Supreme Court

    Today, On 15th January, I-PAC Raids Row escalates as the Enforcement Directorate tells the Supreme Court that a shocking pattern is emerging. The agency alleges that CM Banerjee barges in during statutory action, accompanied by Police Commissioner, before sitting on a dharna.

    author
    BREAKING | ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Liberty to Mention After SC Is Disposed Of: Calcutta HC Adjourns ED & TMC Petitions on I-PAC Raids
    BREAKING | ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Liberty to Mention After SC Is Disposed Of: Calcutta HC Adjourns ED & TMC Petitions on I-PAC Raids
    High CourtHeadlines

    Breaking | ED vs Mamata Banerjee| Calcutta High Court Disposes TMC Plea, Adjourns ED Petition in I-PAC Raids Row

    Today, On 14th January, In ED vs Mamata Banerjee Row, Calcutta High Court disposes of the TMC plea and adjourns the ED petition linked to the I-PAC raids row, marking a major twist in the ongoing political-legal battle between the Enforcement Directorate and West Bengal Chief Minister.

    author
    ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Was It Jantar Mantar? Supreme Court Slams Chaos in Calcutta High Court
    ED vs Mamata Banerjee | Was It Jantar Mantar? Supreme Court Slams Chaos in Calcutta High Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Bengal Govt & Mamata Banerjee Is Obstructing Our Probe: ED Moves Supreme Court Over I-PAC Raids

    The Enforcement Directorate has moved the Supreme Court alleging that the West Bengal government, including Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, obstructed its probe during searches at the I-PAC office and the residence of its director, Pratik Jain, in Kolkata.

    author
    ED’s I-PAC Raids| No Order Should Be Passed Without Hearing Its Side: Bengal Govt Files Caveat in Supreme Court
    ED’s I-PAC Raids| No Order Should Be Passed Without Hearing Its Side: Bengal Govt Files Caveat in Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    ED’s I-PAC Raids| No Order Should Be Passed Without Hearing Its Side: Bengal Govt Files Caveat in Supreme Court

    Today, On 10th January, The West Bengal government led by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court to ensure no order is passed without hearing the state, as the Enforcement Directorate is expected to approach the court in the I-PAC case.

    author
    Waqf Amendment Act| "Do These Changes Violate Equality & Justice?": BJP's Ashwini Upadhyay Moves SC Against Key Provisions
    Waqf Amendment Act| "Do These Changes Violate Equality & Justice?": BJP's Ashwini Upadhyay Moves SC Against Key Provisions
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Waqf Amendment Act| “Do These Changes Violate Equality & Justice?”: BJP’s Ashwini Upadhyay Moves SC Against Key Provisions

    BJP leader and lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay has approached the Supreme Court challenging key provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act, raising the question, “Do these changes violate equality & justice?” The plea seeks a review of constitutional validity.

    author
    Waqf Amendment Act| “Waqf Boards Perform Secular Functions, Including Non-Muslims Won’t Affect Functioning”: Centre to Supreme Court
    Waqf Amendment Act| “Waqf Boards Perform Secular Functions, Including Non-Muslims Won’t Affect Functioning”: Centre to Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtBLOGHeadlines

    Waqf Amendment Act| “Waqf Boards Perform Secular Functions, Including Non-Muslims Won’t Affect Functioning”: Centre to Supreme Court

    Today, On 21st May, The Central government told the Supreme Court that waqf boards handle secular duties, so adding non-Muslims won’t impact their work. It also said Hindu trusts differ, as they don’t allow non-Hindus as members.

    author
    Waqf Amendment Act| “Waqf Boards Perform Secular Functions, Including Non-Muslims Won’t Affect Functioning”: Centre to Supreme Court
    Waqf Amendment Act| “Waqf Boards Perform Secular Functions, Including Non-Muslims Won’t Affect Functioning”: Centre to Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Waqf Amendment Act| “No Individual Can Claim Rights Over Govt Land, Even Under Waqf By User Principle”: Centre to Supreme Court

    Today, On 20th May, Centre Requests Supreme Court to Limit Hearing Scope to Three Specific Issues only while considering interim orders in the ongoing Waqf Amendment Act challenge.

    author
    ‘In Hindus, There’s Moksh’: Supreme Court Sparks Debate Over Waqf as Charity to God
    ‘In Hindus, There’s Moksh’: Supreme Court Sparks Debate Over Waqf as Charity to God
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Waqf Amendment Act| “Who Asks for Proof of Religion?”: Senior Advocate Singhvi

    In the Supreme Court, Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Singhvi questioned the new Waqf law, asking, “Who asks for proof of religion?” while arguing that the law unfairly targets religious endowments.

    author