![[Landmark Judgement] "Centre’s 2023 Model Law on Prisons Doesn’t Have Reference of Caste-Based Discriminations": CJI Bans Inequality in Jails](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Fake-WhatsApp-Message-Circulated-In-The-Name-Of-Chief-Justice-Chandrachud-Check-Out-odishabytes.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Chief Justice of India criticized the Centre’s 2023 Model Law on Prisons for omitting caste-based discrimination prohibitions. He ruled that inequality in prisons is unconstitutional, emphasizing equal treatment for all inmates. The judgment highlighted the need for reforms, rejecting caste-based classifications that hinder rehabilitation and violate constitutional rights.
The Supreme Court Today (Sept 2) refused to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) petition that called for the conduct of a social and caste-based census. A Bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and SVN Bhatti pointed out that it was a policy matter in which the top court was not inclined to interfere. “What is this? This is in the domain of governance. What can we do?” Justice Roy asked when the matter was taken up.
Yesterday, On 12th June, The Madras High Court mandated that transgender individuals be recognized as a special category, separate from male or female classifications, for employment and education opportunities. Age relaxations and distinct criteria for job and educational opportunities are to be provided. This decision was prompted by a petition filed by a transgender individual denied consideration in civil service exams. The court also criticized the unsustainable approach of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission.
The Supreme Court’s seven-judge Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, has concluded its three-day hearing on sub-classification of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes for more equitable reservations. The bench discussed the complexities of ensuring adequate representation for the most backward within these groups, potentially reshaping India’s social justice landscape.
A Constitution bench at India’s Supreme Court is deliberating on the constitutional validity of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes and Tribes for reservation benefits. The Central Government has expressed support for sub-categorization, emphasizing the need for equitable distribution. This pivotal issue has wide-ranging implications for social justice and could reshape India’s reservation policies.
The Bombay High Court criticized the unpreparedness of the petition challenging the issuance of ‘Kunbi’ caste certificates to the ‘Maratha’ community. The court questioned the inclusion of the Maharashtra Advocate General in the petition and emphasized the need for thorough preparation in legal petitions, adjourning the hearing to February 20. The case highlights complexities in caste certification and socio-political issues.
The Kerala government submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court, stating it had no plans to conduct a caste survey and emphasized the responsibility of the Central government in conducting such surveys. The government refuted allegations of intentional disobedience and highlighted the challenges in utilizing socio-economic data for policymaking. This case has significant implications for the identification and support of backward classes in Kerala.
The Supreme Court of India has banned the mention of caste or religion in legal documents, aiming to promote equality and fairness. This decision, prompted by a marital dispute case, will affect all court proceedings. The directive ensures a more inclusive and non-discriminatory approach within the Indian legal system, aligning with constitutional principles.