Calcutta High Court lawyers protested the unexpected transfer of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma from Delhi High Court, refusing to attend his swearing-in. Legal bodies expressed strong opposition, calling the move questionable and unfair.
The Calcutta High Court lifted the ban on appointing 29 civil judges in West Bengal, allowing the recruitment process to proceed after multiple petitions regarding the exam’s conduct were dismissed by Justice Arindam Mukherjee. The court ruled that having a regular and provisional list for appointments was permissible, facilitating official appointments.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that Sandip Ghosh, former principal of R G Kar Medical College, must be given reasonable time before charges in a financial irregularities case are framed. The court emphasized due process while fast-tracking the trial, allowing for a one-week extension to prepare a defense and monitor proceedings closely.
![[BREAKING] RG Kar Rape | Calcutta HC Reserves Judgement on Appeals by State & CBI Seeking Death Penalty for Sanjay Roy](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/RG-kar-8.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Calcutta High Court Today (Jan 27) reserved its judgment on appeals from the West Bengal government and CBI, both demanding the death penalty for Sanjay Roy, convicted of raping and murdering a 31-year-old doctor at Kolkata’s RG Kar College and Hospital. Both parties argue that the life imprisonment sentence handed down by the Sealdah Sessions Court is inadequate, emphasizing the state’s and CBI’s shared pursuit of justice.
The Calcutta High Court Today (Jan 27) began hearing appeals from the West Bengal government and the CBI against the life imprisonment sentence given to Sanjay Roy in the RG Kar hospital rape-murder case. Both parties argue the punishment is too lenient and are demanding the death penalty. The CBI emphasized its right to challenge the sentence as the investigation agency, while the state government asserted its authority to appeal the trial court’s judgment.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed a criminal case against actress Zareen Khan regarding her absence from a 2018 Kali Puja event, ruling it a breach of contract. The court emphasized that criminal proceedings were unnecessary and inappropriate for such civil matters. This ruling highlights the principle that criminal courts should not resolve contractual disputes.
The Calcutta High Court will hear a PIL on January 16 regarding the administration of expired saline at Midnapore Medical College, resulting in critical illnesses and a death. The petition seeks a CBI investigation and formation of an SIT. Outrage has ensued, leading to protests and a police complaint from the deceased’s family.
The Calcutta High Court allowed the application filed by a rape accused seeking DNA Test of the child and clarified that when “non-access” to a relationship is claimed by the accused, it is his right to have the same proved by way of evidence available/possible. The High Court was considering a revisional application preferred against an order of the Additional Sessions Judge arising out a criminal case registered under Sections 376 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The Single-Judge Bench of Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) said, “Thus, when “non-access” is claimed in such a relationship, it is the right of the accused to have the same proved by way of evidence available/possible.”
The Calcutta High Court has permitted a dharna protesting alleged atrocities on “West Bengal Sanatani Hindus,” stipulating compliance with state conditions to avoid traffic disruptions. The organizers, led by Sunil Harsh, aim for 3,000 participants, though the court expressed doubts about meeting this target. The ruling balances the right to protest with public order needs, pending formal order.
The Calcutta High Court ordered the State Authorities to ensure that the Puja Committee of Bolla Kali Temple does not encourage mass sacrifice of animals and also convince people to desist from such mass sacrifice. In light of the fact that the festivities started on November 22, 2024, the Court also directed that if at all sacrifice is done, it should be done in the licensed premises and no other area. The High Court was considering two writ petitions where the petitioners sought for appropriate direction to ensure that no illegal slaughtering of animal takes place in the State of West Bengal (either in the name of God or otherwise) and no animal slaughter takes place in West Bengal for any other purpose apart from serving of food to mankind.