A Bengaluru court fined Tonique for charging a customer for a carry bag that had the store’s branding. The court called the act “unprofessional and unfair,” stating that customers should not be made to pay for unsolicited advertising. Tonique was also directed to pay Rs. 5,000 as compensation to the customer.
![[IndiGo Vs Mahindra] Mahindra Restrain Not To Use '6E' Mark Till Disposal Of IndiGo Suit: Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-13.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
IndiGo is asserting its “6E” trademark rights against Mahindra Electric, which agreed to rename its upcoming electric vehicle from “BE 6E” to “BE 6” amid the legal dispute. Mahindra plans to contest the lawsuit while the court has scheduled a hearing for April 2025, highlighting the significance of trademark usage over mere registration.
India’s largest airline IndiGo has filed a suit before the Delhi High Court for infringement of trademark against Mahindra Electric Automobile Limited for using ‘6E’ in its new electric car called Mahindra BE 6E, which is expected to hit the Indian roads in February 2025. The case came up before Justice Amit Bansal on Tuesday. However, the judge chose to recuse from hearing the matter. The case is now expected to come up for hearing on December 9.
![[Trademark Battle] Delhi High Court Grants Relief to Forest Essentials in Case Against Baby Forest](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/shared-image-1.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court’s Division Bench, comprising Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tara Vitasta Ganju, observed a potential error in the single-judge’s refusal to grant interim relief to Forest Essentials in a trademark dispute against Baby Forest. The Bench issued a notice to Baby Forest and scheduled further hearing on September 9, acknowledging merit in Forest Essentials’ appeal.