Justice Gautam Patel of the Bombay High Court expressed concern over judges facing “intolerable pressure” and “beyond brutal” working hours amid discussions on the Information Technology (IT) Rules Amendment and the proposed Fact-Check Unit. The court adjourned the hearing to February 8, urging the Centre not to notify the FCU until a third judge decides on the issue.
The Bombay High Court criticized the unpreparedness of the petition challenging the issuance of ‘Kunbi’ caste certificates to the ‘Maratha’ community. The court questioned the inclusion of the Maharashtra Advocate General in the petition and emphasized the need for thorough preparation in legal petitions, adjourning the hearing to February 20. The case highlights complexities in caste certification and socio-political issues.
The Bombay High Court has halted Maharashtra’s attempt to amend Section 498A due to insufficient data. The central government is waiting for comprehensive information before reconsidering the amendment. This comes amid discussions about making the offence under Section 498A compoundable, aligning with progressive steps in other states. The court’s recommendation aims to facilitate more amicable resolutions of matrimonial disputes.
The Bombay High Court has intervened in the case involving Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, quashing the summons issued by a magistrate in Goa’s Mapusa over allegations of violating the Model Code of Conduct during the 2017 Goa election campaign. The court’s decision marks a significant moment in the ongoing dialogue about political speech and electoral conduct in India.
The Bombay High Court ruled on a high-profile defamation case involving Javed Akhtar and Kangana Ranaut, denying Ranaut’s request to stay the proceedings. The decision underscores the importance of timing in legal battles and the court’s commitment to procedural integrity. This complex case reflects the challenges of addressing defamation in the context of public figures and media scrutiny.
The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court set a significant precedent on consent and promises of marriage in alleged rape cases. The accused’s withdrawal of a marriage promise, influenced by parental disapproval, was found not to amount to rape. The ruling emphasizes the evolving understanding of personal autonomy and distinguishes between moral obligations and legal culpability, impacting future cases.
POCSO Act – The discrepancy in the victim’s statements regarding the extent of penetration played a crucial role in the Bombay High Court’s decision to reduce the sentence. The Bombay High Court has lesser the sentences of two individuals previously convicted for the sexual assault and mis-treatment of their 13-year-old orphaned niece. The original conviction […]
The Supreme Court of India on Friday (2nd Febuay) has sought the Union Government’s perspective on the contentious issue of requiring retired judges to undergo written examinations for appointments to consumer commissions. This inquiry stems from a broader discussion on the selection process for members of State and District Commissions for Consumer Dispute Redressal, highlighting […]
The Bombay High Court has clarified the legal boundaries surrounding consent and promises of marriage in the context of intimate relationships. This judgment came to light in a case where a woman filed a complaint against a man, alleging rape under the pretext of a broken promise of marriage. The couple had engaged in a […]
The Bombay High Court is taking strong action against three lawyers for their involvement in a false news report aimed at influencing a case. This underscores the importance of upholding legal integrity. The court’s decision to proceed with contempt of court proceedings reaffirms its commitment to upholding the law and maintaining the highest standards of behavior in the legal process.