Today, On 20th November, the Supreme Court ruled that telecom companies, including Airtel and Vodafone Idea, are eligible for CENVAT credit on items like tower parts and shelters. This decision clarifies their classification under tax rules, upholding a 2021 Delhi High Court ruling and overturning a prior Bombay High Court decision.
Today, On 14th November, The Supreme Court criticized Goa’s Chief Secretary for unilaterally altering service rules related to Bombay High Court employees. This remark arose during a case about former employees’ unpaid pensions. The Court demanded accountability, stating the Chief Secretary must justify his actions via video conference next week, emphasizing the need for adherence to proper procedures.
The Bombay Bar Association honored Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for his impactful tenure as he nears retirement. His legacy includes landmark rulings promoting equality and individual rights, and he emphasized transparency and inclusivity in the judiciary. Attendees praised his commitment to compassionate justice and improving access for marginalized groups.
Today, On 29th August, Eminent lawyer AG Noorani, known for his expertise in Constitutional law and deep knowledge of Kashmir and Article 370, passed away at 93. He authored several influential books on these subjects and was a vocal advocate for civil liberties and human rights, leaving a legacy of rigorous scholarship and unwavering commitment to the rule of law.
In a remarkable decision, the Bombay High Court has set a precedent by excusing a 40-year delay in a case involving a litigant who approached the court against land acquisition. This decision underscores the principle that the State’s obligation to compensate cannot be negated by procedural delays. Also read- Bombay High Court Rebukes Sessions Judge […]
In a recent judgment dated September 21, 2023, the Supreme Court emphasized the procedural importance of framing substantial questions of law at the admission stage during Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The apex court stated that if these questions are formulated later, the concerned parties must be granted […]