The Supreme Court of India affirmed that individuals accused under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act have the right to access documents not used by the Enforcement Directorate in their prosecution, ensuring a fair trial as per Article 21 of the Constitution. This includes rights to request evidence, promoting transparency in legal proceedings.
Kamra told the Court that despite receiving over 500 death threats and requests for virtual questioning, the police were insisting that he appear physically in Mumbai for questioning. MUMBAI: Stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra has approached the Bombay High Court seeking to quash an FIR filed against him by the Mumbai Police for allegedly calling Maharashtra […]
The Allahabad High Court ruled that failure to inform an arrested person of the grounds for their arrest violates Article 22 of the Constitution. In the case of Manjeet Singh, the court cancelled his remand order due to this lapse, emphasizing the magistrate’s duty to ensure compliance with constitutional safeguards.
Bombay: 8th April: On Tuesday, the Bombay High Court asked the Maharashtra government to reply to a petition filed by stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra. Kamra has requested the Court to cancel the First Information Report (FIR) filed against him by the Mumbai Police for calling Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde a “gaddar” (traitor) during his comedy show.
A controversy erupted after cash was allegedly recovered from the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma. Senior Advocate Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, former President of the Supreme Court Bar Association, has weighed in on the matter. He expressed confidence that the Supreme Court-appointed In-House Committee will recommend a police or CBI investigation. Aggarwala emphasized the importance of a transparent probe to uphold judicial integrity.
With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”), it is crucial to examine how the law on sanction under crpc and bnss continues to uphold procedural safeguards for public servants.
Today, On 18th February, President Droupadi Murmu granted prosecution sanction against AAP leader Satyendar Jain, the former Delhi Health Minister. The sanction sought under Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. This decision allows legal proceedings to move forward against Jain. The 60-year-old leader faces serious charges, and the sanction paves the way for further action.
Today, On 12th February, The Calcutta High Court has said that the RG Kar Hospital financial irregularities case should be handled quickly to keep people’s trust in the courts. This case was filed soon after the rape and murder of a junior doctor at the hospital, which shocked the entire country. The court warned that delayed justice could make people lose faith in the legal system. It has asked the authorities to conduct a fair and fast investigation into the matter.
The Supreme Court praised the bravery of women who, despite facing significant personal and professional challenges, came forward to record their statements before the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in the Kerala film industry sexual abuse case. Acknowledging their courage, the Court highlighted the importance of supporting victims in their pursuit of justice. The Hema Committee report highlights the difficulties and challenges women face when reporting abuse.
Legal experts have stated that the family of a crime victim is not powerless and can approach the High Court to request a sentence enhancement in serious cases. This power is in addition to the state’s legal authority. The family can petition the appellate court for a tougher sentence in heinous crimes. This ensures that victims’ families have a voice in the judicial process.
