The Karnataka High Court emphasized the importance of job security, stating that termination of a job in public employment deprives an employee of their means of livelihood. The ruling dismissed an appeal and stressed the necessity of a fair hearing before dismissal, setting a precedent in safeguarding the rights of public service employees.
The Kerala High Court, led by Justice Devan Ramachandran, is deliberating a petition against the movie ‘Antony’ for depicting a gun inside a Bible. The judge questioned the intolerance towards religious references in films, recognizing potential publicity benefits for the filmmakers. This case has ignited a debate on balancing artistic freedom and religious sensitivities in India’s diverse society.
The Kerala High Court has granted permission for a family to continue their tradition of offering cooked meat to a goddess in their private temple during the ‘Thirra Maholsavam’ festival. This decision reaffirms the balance between cultural heritage and legal frameworks, emphasizing the right to maintain religious customs within private domains (50 words).
The Kerala High Court emphasized the need for timely disbursement of funds under the Advocates Grant scheme, highlighting the vital role of financial support for lawyers, particularly from disadvantaged backgrounds. The court’s directive followed a petition citing the failure to distribute aid notified in 2021, emphasizing the commitment to ensuring equitable legal representation.
The Supreme Court delivered a split verdict on quashing an FIR against Chandrababu Naidu. Justices disagreed on the applicability of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, leading to a referral to the Chief Justice. The case raises questions about prior sanction for inquiry or investigation of public servants, highlighting complexities in legal interpretation.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court declined a mother’s plea for custody of her 8-year-old daughter, citing the child’s capability to make an informed choice. Despite the mother’s legal right as the natural guardian, the court considered the child’s strong attachment to her current guardians, ultimately ruling in their favor. The court allowed daily visits for the mother but maintained custody with the second husband and his family.
The New Delhi Bar Association requested a reprieve from the Principal District & Sessions Judge for the ‘Pran Pratishtha’ ceremony of Bhagwan Shri Ram in Ayodhya on January 22, 2024, foreseeing advocate and litigant absence. This highlights the intersection of religious events and legal obligations in India, as well as the cultural significance of the Ram Mandir inauguration.
The Supreme Court of India has temporarily halted the survey of the Shahi Idgah land in Mathura, following a plea by the mosque committee. This comes after the Allahabad High Court’s decision to allow the survey, which was contested by the mosque committee. The case continues to be a complex legal and religious battle with far-reaching implications.
The faction of Shiv Sena led by CM Eknath Shinde has challenged the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Speaker’s decision on the disqualification of 14 MLAs in the Bombay High Court. This unfolds amid a political split and highlights issues of whip authority, party allegiance, and constitutional interpretations. The case holds significant implications for Shiv Sena’s future and Maharashtra’s political dynamics.
The Uddhav Thackeray faction of Shiv Sena has challenged the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker’s recognition of the Eknath Shinde-led faction as the legitimate party. The dispute arose from a split in the party, impacting leadership and upcoming elections. This legal battle has significant implications for Maharashtra’s political landscape and the future of Shiv Sena.